Well, the path to godhead, held within the Gnostic tradition, was an interesting interlude, in human expression in search of God. Its so dense, and filled with elaborate myth and fantastic characters, yet it left me empty and wondering. Was this God inspired or did it evolve from the elaborate imagination of intellectual philosophers in love with the mind. And after all is said and done, it still leaves the aspirant longing for God’s presence and power, in tangible form within us.

So I was awake at four in the morning and this is what came to me…you must explore the Via Negativa. I know a little about this approach from mystics like Saint John of the Cross and from the mystic book The Cloud of Unknowing, and of course Eastern Philosophy is littered with this path, exemplified by the phrase, “Neti Neti,” (not this, not this).

I think this voice was coming from my 13th-14th century self, held within the self-existent being, remembering’s of the past life of Meister Eckhart. As a clergyman of the Catholic faith, he was steeped in the same religious denseness of intellectual and religious ideology of his time.

“The water that fills my pond was once, a while ago, in China, and before that Germany, and before that in Africa, on and on, the water reconstituting itself, as its molecules of its constitution, are reformed over and over again, traveling in the clouds upon the wind, without worry or thought, constantly rolling, solidifying into form and then descending into gas, and becoming something new at every moment. The atoms that form the water in the Ganges, tasting veneration and respect, washing the faithful aspirants, loosen themselves, and are lifted up into the atmosphere, so they can travel. Then they are moved, they are carried by forces beyond themselves, they fly on the wind, then they are dropped off, into my pond, and in another transformation of being, they freeze and become the ice that is the winter covering. Constantly transforming and becoming something new, yet absolutely the same. Static in movement. This is God. Its His|Her reflection. It is Brahman and it is the manifestation of our own being. Movement within silent stillness, chaos within stillness, balanced in crisp potential.

I am dynamic change held in perfect stillness. Nothing stands still within Brahman. Everything merges and dissolves and is reconstituted, into something else, beneath the dancing feet of Shiva. So why resist? Tomorrow we will become totally reconstituted as something else, with no action on our part.

Shiva dances to the vibrations that flows from the creation, and there among all the murmuring hum is the vibration that flows from the human, both in speech and deed. And out of this idea, I was just taught that if you want to manifest, you cannot do it with your mind, you have to unleash it within a blank mind, where the vibration of your souls desires can be manifested, in murmured quietude.

Then as I lay awake, this thought came upon me, and I was troubled by it for a long time, as I contemplated its meaning and implications.

So the Gnostics and Eastern Philosophy would say that there is a Spark of God within me. They would say that it is a perfect fractal portion of God, of which I am a part. They would further explain that God exists within us, and sees through all of our eyes, experiencing what we experience, experiencing all of the things that other humans experience, observing it all through their eyes as well as ours. And beyond this, they would say, that everything that we pass through is God; which implies of course that The All, both the Good and the Bad consists of God. Our consciousness, is God’s consciousness, which we all share.

This conception, makes God incredibly close to us, feeling all of the same emotions, actions, and reactions that we experience. Yet this very closeness, makes God distant, because He|She remains totally hidden. The one who is always watching.

So is God nothing more than a voyeur, getting off on being the Spark of Divinity, being the silent witness, observing everything, all of it, every shitty thing we do, and also the things that crown us with dignity and respect as humans.

Only I could make this understanding problematic, I’m right brained and I am talented at synthesizing vastness into singularity, yet that can lead to madness as well. So what does this imply for our understanding of God, who is in His|Her very essence a being that expands from singularity to vastness, carrying us and creation within.

If we are a spark of the Godhead, then how can we be condemned, because to condemn us is to condemn God within us. And if God is within us, experiencing both the good and bad of the world, as a omnipresent, omnipotent being, and observes as an aloof observer, while there is horrendous suffering and pain, what does that say about God?

I am sure you thing of something else at 4:00 A.M but this is where my heart and soul comes to rest.

And who the fuck am I to even notice or to try to comprehend? Yet, if I don’t, I am condemned to living a life, that divorcees my soul from the presence of God. So I understand fully, those among the human who say “Fuck this,” and just become determined to live life and to cast God away as to dense and immutable, to be worth trying to understand. Who wants to pursue a being, whose main attribute is playing a game that requires you to guess His|Her form and the purpose of His|Her being.

Maybe, The Via Negativa is the path, since it is the a mirror imitation of God. By casting all ideation away, slowly a part at a time, we travel a path to what God is at the most basic level; like the molecules that make up the water, the constituent parts, held within the void, until called upon to become water from its gaseous predecessor. Do you see. God rests within us, the watcher, because he is curious at how the forms of the void, will be transformed into living substance reflecting His|Her own being and power.

Water is the perfect metaphor of God’s being.

So what’s the point?

With every blink of your eyes, with every breath you take, everything is totally transformed into something else, everything is movement within stillness as the forms emerge from Brahman.

What if God has created us to create our own God. In other words, even though possibly inspired, all religions flow from the minds of humans. Its our faith in ideation of a God, that allows to find a path of adoration and worship the divine. BUT IT IS ALL MADE UP IN THE MIND OF MAN. THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE. Just as water is constantly reconstituting itself, and traveling, and breathing in all the possibility for itself within static Braham, this shouts at us, but few have ears to hear, that God is transcendent and constantly changing, and because of this cannot be conscribed by any religion or practice.

God flows, and those whose object is to solidify God into form, are hopelessly lost. Don’t you see, this is what all religion attempts to do; they all attempt to place a form over a formless God. That is the advantage of the Via Negativa. We don’t place a form of a God who is transcendent and absolutely formless; instead, we take away all the forms, all the falsehood, all the speculation of man, and reduce God to His|Her essential being. And listen carefully, this does not make God less, this makes God everything, by becoming nothing. God is formless and transcendent in being, until form is taken on within Brahman, where formlessness is transformed into form.

So lets think of the universe as breath, expansion to contraction. God expands from as single point into everything, and we are called to place our heart and spirit into an attenuation that goes from the freedom of all potential, that God has expanded out into for our benefit, so we can exist togethr as one being within creation; and both God an us can discover what we are, and whether we are compatible beings, and after finding out seek, to return through all of the form to singularity, to the essential being of ourselves and God or Father|Mother.

This is why Jesus gave us the gift of speaking in tongues and this is also why the Gnostics taught the use of vibration, because it us a Via Negativa or all the Hindu practices that seek to accomplish the same goal. They are means by which, we can still the mind of forms and ideas, and to return to the essential elements of God’s being and presence, and in that state become One. In that state of essential emptiness and potentiality, we can feel the love of God’s undefined presence, which in spite of what all the human religions say, we can only know by slaughtering God in our mind, as Meister Eckhart implores us to do.

AI: The Via Negativa (or negative way) in Meister Eckhart’s philosophy is a mystical approach that define God by what God is not rather than what God is. Because human language and thought are too small to capture the infinite, Eckhart taught that we must strip away all labels, concepts, and images of the Divine to reach the true, nameless Godhead (Gottheit) beyond the traditional creator God.

Core Ideas of Eckhart’s Negative Way

Beyond Human Speech: Words like “good,” “wise,” or “love” limit God, so Eckhart famously prayed to be “rid of God,” meaning rid of the mental box of who God is.
The Godhead (Gottheit): The ultimate reality is a radical, silent dark void or “nothingness” out of which the personal God emerges, meaning God precedes all categories of being.
Letting Go (Gelassenheit): To experience this divine depth, a person must let go of all attached images, ego desires, and worldly constructs, emptying the soul so God can act within.
The Divine Spark (Unteilet): Deep within the silent, emptied soul lies a pure spark (grunt) that is identical with the unnamable Godhead.

Why Eckhart Emphasized Negation

Overcomes Paradox: It forces the mind past normal logic, recognizing that God is simultaneously nothing and everything.

Protects Transcendence: It stops humans from turning God into a giant physical or psychological object.

Shifts Practice: Moves religion away from just following external rules or intellectual belief into an experiential, silent encounter with mystery.

AI: Meister Eckhart’s Via Negativa shares striking parallels with Eastern mystical traditions, particularly Zen Buddhism and Daoism. All three paths look past words, conceptual thinking, and a personal deity to find an ultimate reality described as a fruitful “nothingness.”

1. Buddhism (Zen and Madhyamaka)

The Concept of Emptiness: Eckhart’s description of the Godhead as a “silent void” or “nothingness” mirrors the Buddhist concept of Śūnyatā (emptiness).
Not Lack, but Potential: Neither Eckhart’s “nothing” nor Buddhist “emptiness” means a blank void of non-existence; instead, it is a reality so full of potential that no single form can define it.
Stripping the Ego: Eckhart’s Gelassenheit (detachment/letting go) functions exactly like the Buddhist practice of dissolving the illusion of the ego (Anatta) to end suffering and realize true nature.
Beyond Logic: Just as Eckhart uses paradox to break the intellect, Zen Buddhism utilizes koans (riddles with no logical answer) to force the mind past dualistic, rational thought.

2. Daoism (Philosophical Daoism)

The Unnamable Source: The opening line of the Dao De Jing (“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao”) mirrors Eckhart’s view that any God you can name is not the true Godhead.
Actionless Action: Daoism emphasizes Wu Wei (effortless action or non-doing), which directly aligns with Eckhart’s ideal of a detached soul acting “without a why” (ohne Warum), purely out of its own nature.
The Primal Darkness: Both traditions use the imagery of darkness to represent ultimate reality—Ehkart speaks of the “silent darkness” of the Godhead, while Daoism refers to the Dao as the dark, mysterious womb of the universe.

Key Difference: The Ground of Being

While the psychological and linguistic methods are nearly identical, their final frameworks differ. Eckhart remains rooted in a Western monistic framework where the soul merges with the divine ground of being (Grund). Buddhism rejects the idea of any permanent cosmic ground or soul, viewing reality instead as an interconnected web of shifting conditions.

Comparing the specific text of Meister Eckhart side-by-side with Laozi’s Dao De Jing reveals identical mystical mechanics across completely different eras and cultures. Both frameworks prioritize unnamability, silence, and purposeless action. [1]

1. The Nameless Absolute

Both traditions insist that human concepts and language completely fail to capture ultimate reality. Giving the Divine a label or definition instantly turns it into something limited.

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 1)
“As the Godhead is nameless, and all naming is alien to Him, so also the soul is nameless; for it is here the same as God.”	“The Way that can be spoken of is not the constant Way; The name that can be named is not the constant name.”

The Connection: Eckhart separates the personal “God” (who has attributes) from the primal “Godhead” (Gottheit), which has no name. Laozi similarly notes that any “Dao” you can fit into human language is just a temporary projection, not the actual, eternal source.

2. Radical Subtraction vs. Desires

To experience this ultimate source, both mystics teach that a human must radically empty their mind, stripping away mental concepts, expectations, and personal desires.

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 1)
“God is not found in the soul by adding anything, but by a process of subtraction.” “Any object you have in your mind, however good, will be a barrier between you and the inmost Truth.”	“Hence always rid yourself of desires in order to observe its secrets.” “In the pursuit of the Dao, every day something is dropped.”

The Connection: Most religious paths focus on adding virtues, prayers, or knowledge. Eckhart and Laozi do the exact opposite. For them, truth is already fully present; you just have to “drop” or “subtract” the clutter of human thoughts and demands to notice it.

3. Living “Without a Why” (Wu Wei)

The ultimate spiritual lifestyle in both philosophies is to act spontaneously from your true nature, completely free of transactional motives or calculating goals.

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 2)
“If you ask a genuine person who acts from his own ground: ‘Why are you doing what you are doing?’… he would say: ‘I do it because I do it.’“ “Perform all of your deeds without whys and wherefores.”	“The Sage manages affairs without action (wu wei) and conveys instructions without words.” “The Dao never acts, yet nothing is left undone.”

The Connection: Eckhart calls this living ohne Warum (“without a why”). If you do good just to get into heaven, you are treating God like a transaction. Laozi’s Wu Wei is the exact same concept: acting naturally and effortlessly like flowing water, without forcing an agenda or chasing external rewards.

4. Ultimate Reality as Ultimate Silence

Both paths point to absolute stillness and quiet as the most accurate earthly reflection of the cosmic source.

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 25)
“There is nothing so much like God in all the universe as silence.”	“There was something undefined and complete, coming into existence before Heaven and Earth. How still it was and formless!”

The Connection: Words create divisions (this vs. that). True silence collapses all dualities, allowing the individual to rest in the unified ground of existence without building artificial mental structures.

The imagery of the “Womb” and “Birth” serves as a vital bridge between Meister Eckhart’s theology and Laozi’s Dao De Jing. While mainstream Western theology usually portrays God as a dominant, external father king, Eckhart steps into a maternal framework. Both he and Laozi present the ultimate source of reality not as a static ruler, but as a fertile, dark womb that continuously gives birth.

1. The Divine Womb: A Void That Bears Fruit

For both mystics, ultimate reality is a paradox. It is completely empty of physical forms, yet it acts as a cosmic womb teeming with limitless, creative potential.

Meister Eckhart: He refers to the innermost core of the human soul as a “silent middle” or a deep “ground” (Grund). This inner space must be completely stripped of all mental images, memories, and worldly desires. Once it is rendered completely empty, it becomes a receptive womb where God births the Divine Word (Logos).
Laozi: The Dao De Jing explicitly frames the Dao using maternal vocabulary, calling it the “Great Mother” and the “Mysterious Female”.“The Tao never dies; It is a deep womb. And the opening of the womb is called the root of heaven and earth.” — Chapter 6

The Parallel: Both traditions reject the idea of a sterile, cold nothingness. Instead, they present a fertile void. The emptied human soul (Eckhart) and the primordial source of reality (Laozi) are both dark, quiet spaces that give birth to the cosmos.

From AI: Meister Eckhart used water imagery, comparing the union of the soul and God to water in a vessel or a flask. He described the soul’s capacity for intelligence and grace as a vessel containing water, where the water and the vessel are intimately unified.

Water Metaphors in Eckhart’s Sermons

The Flask and Water: Eckhart explained that water is inside a flask so the flask contains it, yet they interpenetrate so completely that one without the other is hard to comprehend, mirroring the soul in God and God in the soul.
The Flowing Spring: He likened the Godhead imparting itself to the soul to a perpetual spring watering the roots of flowers.
The Rapid River: He also referenced scriptural imagery of a “rapid river” of divine love and the Holy Spirit that refreshes and rejoices the soul.

Opinions on his exact non-dual phrasing remain a point of discussion among modern theologians studying mysticism and follow three main opinions.

Three distinct modern perspectives:

1. The Eastern/Perennialist View (Radical Non-Dualism)

Scholars in this camp view Eckhart as a bridge figure who transcended the traditional boundaries of Western Christianity. They point to extreme statements he made, such as “The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me” or his desire to be “identical with Himself, not just united.”

The Argument: Thinkers like Richard Rohr and modern contemplative teachers argue that Eckhart experienced pure, unitive consciousness. They believe his phrasing deliberately deconstructs the dualistic barrier between the Creator and creation, echoing an absolute oneness where the soul and the divine share the exact same “ground” (grunt).

2. The Orthodox Christian View (Panentheism)

Mainstream Christian theologians and the Dominican Order vigorously reject the idea that Eckhart was a pure monist or pantheist (someone who believes the universe and God are identical).

The Argument: They argue his phrasing must be read through the lens of classical Christian theology and Neoplatonism. In this view, Eckhart is a panentheist—believing that “all is in God and God is in all,” but that God still ultimately retains a transcendent identity above creation. They argue his radical non-dual statements were simply bold, poetic expressions of theosis (divinization through grace), not a literal dissolution of the human soul into God.

3. The Scholastic/Linguistic View (Intentional Provocation)

Other academic historians focus on Eckhart’s unique role as both a university-trained academic (scholastic) and a vernacular preacher.

The Argument: This group argues that Eckhart used “blatantly nonstandard” and shocking language to shake his listeners out of passive, intellectual dogmatism. Because he preached to lay audiences in High German rather than academic Latin, his vivid phrasing—like praying to “rid me of God”—was a rhetorical strategy. They argue the “discussion” exists primarily because Eckhart intentionally refused to provide easy definitions for his most radical metaphors

1. D.T. Suzuki: Eckhart as the “Zen Master” of the West

The synthesis of Meister Eckhart’s Via Negativa and Daoist/Buddhist imagery served as the foundational blueprint for modern thinkers who introduced Eastern philosophy to the West. In the mid-20th century, D.T. Suzuki and Alan Watts used Eckhart as a translation bridge, showing Western audiences that concepts like emptiness, unnamability, and spiritual rebirth were not exclusively Asian, but universal human insights.

The prominent Japanese scholar D.T. Suzuki explicitly used Meister Eckhart to validate Zen Buddhism to Western intellectuals. In his definitive book, Mysticism: Christian and Buddhist, Suzuki argued that Eckhart’s concepts were structurally identical to Mahayana Buddhism.

The Godhead as Prajñā (Transcendental Wisdom): Suzuki mapped Eckhart’s distinction between “God” and the “Godhead” directly onto the Buddhist relationship between form and emptiness. He explained that Eckhart’s “nameless nothingness” was the exact equivalent of Zen’s “original formless mind”.
“The Eye with Which I See God”: Suzuki was deeply fascinated by Eckhart’s famous quote: “The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me.” Suzuki utilized this to explain Buddhist non-duality (Advaya), illustrating that there is no separate “seeker” looking at a distant “Divine object”—the act of pure awareness is one unified event.

Alan Watts: Deconstructing the Cosmic “Ego”

The philosopher and speaker Alan Watts leveraged Eckhart to bypass rigid Christian dogma and point Western seekers toward an experiential, mystical worldview. Watts frequently referenced Eckhart in his legendary lectures on Zen and Daoism. [1, 2]

The Divine Womb as the Ground of Being: Watts often criticized the Western view of God as an aggressive, external “architect” or “monarch.” To challenge this, he used Laozi’s concept of the Dao as a mother womb along with Eckhart’s concept of the divine “ground” (Grund). Watts taught that humans are not “made” by a separate God like clay pots; rather, we are “birthed” out of the universe like leaves from a tree.
The Psychology of Detachment (Gelassenheit): Watts heavily integrated Eckhart’s Via Negativa into his critiques of modern ego anxiety. He noted that trying to “force” yourself to be spiritual or moral was counterproductive. Instead, Watts taught that by practicing Eckhartian subtraction—dropping the ego’s illusion of control—a person naturally slides into Wu Wei (spontaneous, effortless action).

The Lasting Impact

By using Eckhart as a cultural anchor, Suzuki and Watts achieved two massive philosophical breakthroughs:

Normalized Eastern Thought: They proved that Zen and Daoism were not “bizarre, exotic Asian mysteries,” but matched the highest peaks of Western contemplative theology.
Revived Western Mysticism: They helped modern Westerners rediscover their own forgotten mystical lineage, introducing a generation of seekers to the deep, silent current of Christian apophatic theology.

If you are interested, we can look into:

How these concepts influenced the Kyoto School of Philosophy, which formally blended Eckhart with Buddhist metaphysics
How the psychological side of these ideas influenced Carl Jung’s concept of the unconscious depth of the sel

AI Mode Conversation: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckharts philophy of religion

You said: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

The Via Negativa (or negative way) in Meister Eckhart’s philosophy is a mystical approach that defines God by what God is not rather than what God is. Because human language and thought are too small to capture the infinite, Eckhart taught that we must strip away all labels, concepts, and images of the Divine to reach the true, nameless Godhead (Gottheit) beyond the traditional creator God. [1, 2, 3]

Core Ideas of Eckhart’s Negative Way

Beyond Human Speech: Words like “good,” “wise,” or “love” limit God, so Eckhart famously prayed to be “rid of God,” meaning rid of the mental box of who God is. [1]
The Godhead (Gottheit): The ultimate reality is a radical, silent dark void or “nothingness” out of which the personal God emerges, meaning God precedes all categories of being. [1, 2, 3]
Letting Go (Gelassenheit): To experience this divine depth, a person must let go of all attached images, ego desires, and worldly constructs, emptying the soul so God can act within. [1, 2, 3]
The Divine Spark (Unteilet): Deep within the silent, emptied soul lies a pure spark (grunt) that is identical with the unnamable Godhead. [1]

Why Eckhart Emphasized Negation

Protects Transcendence: It stops humans from turning God into a giant physical or psychological object.
Shifts Practice: Moves religion away from just following external rules or intellectual belief into an experiential, silent encounter with mystery.
Overcomes Paradox: It forces the mind past normal logic, recognizing that God is simultaneously nothing and everything.
Explore a brief overview of negative theology on Wikipedia.
Read about the definitions on Encyclopedia.com.
Review a detailed study from Cambridge Core. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

If you’d like, I can:

Compare the Via Negativa to Eckhart’s contrasting Via Positiva (positive way)
Explore how this relates to Eastern mystical traditions like Buddhism or Daoism

12 sites

Eckhart on the God of Creation and the Nameless God of MysteryWe cannot name God who “is higher than names or nature” and when we try to put a name on God, “then it is not God.” God is bigger …Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox
“Thou Shalt Dare the Dark” (Via Negativa) – Daily Meditations with Matthew FoxThe Via Negativa is a path of darkness, silence, and solitude. It also includes pain, letting go, and letting be. The commandment …Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox
Celebrating the ineffable – Science MusingsBut with Eckhart’s via positiva there is also a via negativa. God is not this and is not that. God is unknown and unnamable, a mys…Science Musings

Show all

Explore how this relates to Eastern mystical traditions like Buddhism or Daoism

Meister Eckhart’s Via Negativa shares striking parallels with Eastern mystical traditions, particularly Zen Buddhism and Daoism. All three paths look past words, conceptual thinking, and a personal deity to find an ultimate reality described as a fruitful “nothingness.” [1, 2]

1. Buddhism (Zen and Madhyamaka)

The Concept of Emptiness: Eckhart’s description of the Godhead as a “silent void” or “nothingness” mirrors the Buddhist concept of Śūnyatā (emptiness). [1, 2, 3, 4]
Not Lack, but Potential: Neither Eckhart’s “nothing” nor Buddhist “emptiness” means a blank void of non-existence; instead, it is a reality so full of potential that no single form can define it. [1, 2, 3]
Stripping the Ego: Eckhart’s Gelassenheit (detachment/letting go) functions exactly like the Buddhist practice of dissolving the illusion of the ego (Anatta) to end suffering and realize true nature. [1]
Beyond Logic: Just as Eckhart uses paradox to break the intellect, Zen Buddhism utilizes koans (riddles with no logical answer) to force the mind past dualistic, rational thought. [1]

2. Daoism (Philosophical Daoism)

The Unnamable Source: The opening line of the Dao De Jing (“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao”) mirrors Eckhart’s view that any God you can name is not the true Godhead. [1, 2, 3]
Actionless Action: Daoism emphasizes Wu Wei (effortless action or non-doing), which directly aligns with Eckhart’s ideal of a detached soul acting “without a why” (ohne Warum), purely out of its own nature. [1, 2, 3]
The Primal Darkness: Both traditions use the imagery of darkness to represent ultimate reality—Ehkart speaks of the “silent darkness” of the Godhead, while Daoism refers to the Dao as the dark, mysterious womb of the universe. [1]

Key Difference: The Ground of Being

If you are interested, we can expand on this by:

Looking at specific quotes from Eckhart alongside passages from the Dao De Jing
Exploring how modern philosophers (like the Kyoto School in Japan) used Eckhart to bridge East and West [1]

23 sites

Meister Eckhart’s Mysticism in Comparison with Zen BuddhismNov 23, 2022 — In this way, through Meister Eckhart’s thought, “without why,” and the Zen example, “no meaning,” one can establish an exact corre…Taylor & Francis Online
Midterm Review Questions Flashcards1. There are three major models of ultimate reality. Which of the three models supports the claim that right and wrong do not exis…Quizlet
“The Poetry of Wang Wei” | Open IndianaAfter coming into contact with the literature and sūtras on prajñā and śūnyatā then circulating, they ( The cultured elite of sout…Indiana University Bloomington

Show all

Looking at specific quotes from Eckhart alongside passages from the Dao De Jing

1. The Nameless Absolute

Both traditions insist that human concepts and language completely fail to capture ultimate reality. Giving the Divine a label or definition instantly turns it into something limited. [1, 2]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 1)
“As the Godhead is nameless, and all naming is alien to Him, so also the soul is nameless; for it is here the same as God.”	“The Way that can be spoken of is not the constant Way; The name that can be named is not the constant name.”

2. Radical Subtraction vs. Desires

To experience this ultimate source, both mystics teach that a human must radically empty their mind, stripping away mental concepts, expectations, and personal desires. [1]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 1)
“God is not found in the soul by adding anything, but by a process of subtraction.” “Any object you have in your mind, however good, will be a barrier between you and the inmost Truth.”	“Hence always rid yourself of desires in order to observe its secrets.” “In the pursuit of the Dao, every day something is dropped.”

3. Living “Without a Why” (Wu Wei)

The ultimate spiritual lifestyle in both philosophies is to act spontaneously from your true nature, completely free of transactional motives or calculating goals. [1]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 2)
“If you ask a genuine person who acts from his own ground: ‘Why are you doing what you are doing?’… he would say: ‘I do it because I do it.’“ “Perform all of your deeds without whys and wherefores.”	“The Sage manages affairs without action (wu wei) and conveys instructions without words.” “The Dao never acts, yet nothing is left undone.”

4. Ultimate Reality as Ultimate Silence

Both paths point to absolute stillness and quiet as the most accurate earthly reflection of the cosmic source. [1]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 25)
“There is nothing so much like God in all the universe as silence.”	“There was something undefined and complete, coming into existence before Heaven and Earth. How still it was and formless!”

If you’d like to dive deeper, we can look at:

The shared imagery of the “Womb” or “Birth” (Eckhart’s Birth of the Word in the Soul vs. Laozi’s Dao as the Mother of the World)
How these concepts directly influenced modern thinkers like Alan Watts or D.T. Suzuki [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

12 sites

Use These Eckhart Tolle and Tao te Ching Quotes … – MediumDec 31, 2020 — Eckhart’s quote is reminiscent of another found in Lao Tzu’s sage book the Tao te Ching. From Chapter 44: “Be content with what yo…Medium·David Gerken
Meister Eckhart – Tao Te ChingQuotes by Meister Eckhart (28 quotes) * “A free mind is one which is untroubled and unfettered by anything, which has not bound it…laotzu.xyz
道德經- Dao De Jing道德經: 有物混成，先天地生。寂兮寥兮，獨立不改，周行而不殆，可以為天下母。吾不知其名，字之曰道，強為之名曰大。大曰逝，逝曰遠，遠曰反。故道大，天大，地大，王亦大。域中有四大，而王居其一焉。人法地，地法天，天法道，道法自然。 … There w…Chinese Text Project

Show all

The shared imagery of the “Womb” or “Birth” (Eckhart’s Birth of the Word in the Soul vs. Laozi’s Dao as the Mother of the World)

1. The Divine Womb: A Void That Bears Fruit

For both mystics, ultimate reality is a paradox. It is completely empty of physical forms, yet it acts as a cosmic womb teeming with limitless, creative potential. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Meister Eckhart: He refers to the innermost core of the human soul as a “silent middle” or a deep “ground” (Grund). This inner space must be completely stripped of all mental images, memories, and worldly desires. Once it is rendered completely empty, it becomes a receptive womb where God births the Divine Word (Logos). [1, 2, 3, 4]
Laozi: The Dao De Jing explicitly frames the Dao using maternal vocabulary, calling it the “Great Mother” and the “Mysterious Female”.“The Tao never dies; It is a deep womb. And the opening of the womb is called the root of heaven and earth.” — Chapter 6 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

2. The Unceasing Birth: An Eternal Process

Neither mystic views birth as a single, historical event that happened long ago. Instead, creation is an unceasing, present-moment reality. [1, 2]

Meister Eckhart: He argues that the historical birth of Christ in Bethlehem matters little unless that same birth happens inside you today.“This birth which takes place unceasingly in eternity is the very same birth which has taken place within human nature.” [1, 2]
Laozi: The Dao does not simply create the universe and walk away. It acts as a continuous life force, pushing and nourishing all things to grow according to their internal nature.“The world had a beginning, and this beginning could be the mother of the world. When you know the mother, go to know the child.” — Chapter 52 [1, 2, 3]

The Parallel: For both thinkers, you do not find the ultimate truth by looking backward at history or forward to an afterlife. You experience it by tuning into an ongoing, eternal birth happening right now in the present moment. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

3. Spiritual Attainment: Returning to the Source

Because both traditions view creation as a birth, the ultimate goal of the spiritual life is to trace the lineage backward—moving from the “children” (the chaotic, fragmented things of the world) back to the “Mother” (the unified source). [1, 2]

Meister Eckhart: To allow the Birth of the Word to happen, the soul must “withdraw from all things” and return to its primal, uncreated state. Eckhart calls this “God returning to God”—the soul shedding its ego to slide back into the divine womb of the Godhead.
Laozi: True wisdom is knowing the individual things of the earth, but consciously choosing to cling tightly to the maternal source.“All things issue from it; all things return to it. To find the origin, trace back the manifestations. When you recognize the children and find The Mother, you will be free of sorrow.” — Chapter 25/52 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

The Parallel: Enlightenment or salvation is framed as a reversal of the birth process. A person stops losing themselves in the distractions of the material world (“the children”) and intentionally anchors their consciousness back in the calm, unmoving peace of the cosmic origin (“the Mother”). [1, 2, 3]

If you want to continue this analysis, let me know if you would like to:

Explore how these ideas influenced modern psychology (like Carl Jung’s concepts of the collective unconscious and the “anima”)
Look at how both traditions view the concept of “The Infant” as a symbol of perfect spiritual purity [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

30 sites

“The spirit that never dies is called the mysterious feminine …Jun 30, 2026 — 通向这个无比幽深的生殖之源的门径，就是这个天地世界的根本。它绵延存在而又若有若无，它施展的作用无穷无尽。 The Dao is the mother of all things. She is the “spirit of the valley” who…Facebook·Dr. Wayne W. Dyer
Probing the Depths of Evil and Good | Lafayette TodayApr 29, 2021 — Godhead as the Ungrund (non-ground), compatible with Bud- dhist Emptiness? Eckhart prayed to be delivered from “God” in order to a…Lafayette Today
Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi 0791441121 …2 All of these things come forth from the Dao in the way that babies emerge from the womb. In saying that the Way is a “personal r…dokumen.pub

Show all

How these concepts directly influenced modern thinkers like Alan Watts or D.T. Suzuk

1. D.T. Suzuki: Eckhart as the “Zen Master” of the West

The Godhead as Prajñā (Transcendental Wisdom): Suzuki mapped Eckhart’s distinction between “God” and the “Godhead” directly onto the Buddhist relationship between form and emptiness. He explained that Eckhart’s “nameless nothingness” was the exact equivalent of Zen’s “original formless mind”.
“The Eye with Which I See God”: Suzuki was deeply fascinated by Eckhart’s famous quote: “The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me.” Suzuki utilized this to explain Buddhist non-duality (Advaya), illustrating that there is no separate “seeker” looking at a distant “Divine object”—the act of pure awareness is one unified event.

2. Alan Watts: Deconstructing the Cosmic “Ego”

The Divine Womb as the Ground of Being: Watts often criticized the Western view of God as an aggressive, external “architect” or “monarch.” To challenge this, he used Laozi’s concept of the Dao as a mother womb along with Eckhart’s concept of the divine “ground” (Grund). Watts taught that humans are not “made” by a separate God like clay pots; rather, we are “birthed” out of the universe like leaves from a tree.
The Psychology of Detachment (Gelassenheit): Watts heavily integrated Eckhart’s Via Negativa into his critiques of modern ego anxiety. He noted that trying to “force” yourself to be spiritual or moral was counterproductive. Instead, Watts taught that by practicing Eckhartian subtraction—dropping the ego’s illusion of control—a person naturally slides into Wu Wei (spontaneous, effortless action).

The Lasting Impact

By using Eckhart as a cultural anchor, Suzuki and Watts achieved two massive philosophical breakthroughs:

Normalized Eastern Thought: They proved that Zen and Daoism were not “bizarre, exotic Asian mysteries,” but matched the highest peaks of Western contemplative theology.
Revived Western Mysticism: They helped modern Westerners rediscover their own forgotten mystical lineage, introducing a generation of seekers to the deep, silent current of Christian apophatic theology.

If you are interested, we can look into:

How these concepts influenced the Kyoto School of Philosophy, which formally blended Eckhart with Buddhist metaphysics
How the psychological side of these ideas influenced Carl Jung’s concept of the unconscious depth of the self

Apophatic Theology

Apophatic theology, also known as the Via Negativa (negative way), is a mystical approach to understanding the divine by defining what God is not, rather than what God is. It asserts that the ultimate reality is far beyond human language, logic, and comprehension. Therefore, any positive description we give to God (like “wise,” “good,” or “powerful”) is fundamentally inaccurate because it limits something that is infinite.

Core Concepts of Apophatic Theology

Limitation of Language: Words can only describe things within human experience, making them entirely inadequate for describing the transcendent creator.
Divine Incomprehensibility: The ultimate truth is a mystery so profound that it is often described using paradoxes, such as a “brilliant darkness” or a “fruitful nothingness.”
Radical Subtraction: Spiritual growth is achieved not by acquiring more concepts or intellectual knowledge, but by stripping away mental constructs, images, and illusions.
Silent Encounter: True connection with the Divine happens in absolute stillness and quiet, where the rational mind surrenders to direct experience.

Apophatic vs. Kataphatic Theology

Christian tradition balances two contrasting paths to understanding the divine:

Kataphatic Theology (Via Positiva): Uses positive assertions. It says, “God is love,” “God is light,” or “God is a father.” It relies on symbols, analogies, and scriptures to describe divine attributes.
Apophatic Theology (Via Negativa): Undoes those assertions. It says, “God is not love in any way humans understand love,” or “God is beyond light and darkness.” It serves as a necessary guard against idolatry, stopping humans from confusing their limited concepts with the true Absolute.

Major Thinkers and Traditions

Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite: A 5th-century Christian mystic whose writings laid the foundational framework for Christian apophaticism.
Meister Eckhart: The medieval German philosopher who famously prayed to be “rid of God” so that he could experience the nameless, formless Godhead.
Eastern Orthodox Christianity: Unlike Western Christianity, which relies heavily on rational kataphatic theology, Eastern Orthodoxy prioritizes the apophatic approach, viewing God as fundamentally unknowable in His essence.
Global Parallels: While deeply rooted in Western monotheism, the apophatic mindset is structurally identical to the Hindu concept of Neti Neti (“not this, not that”) and the Daoist view of the unnamable Dao.

Pseudo-Dionysiusand the Mystical Theology.

The foundational text for Western apophatic theology is Mystical Theology, a brief but revolutionary 5th-century treatise written by an anonymous Syrian monk known as Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. This text shaped the entire mystical trajectory of thinkers like Meister Eckhart by arguing that the closest a human can get to God is through radical “unknowing”.

Below are key textual examples from his work that demonstrate how apophatic theology operates in practice.

1. The Call to Absolute Subtraction

At the very beginning of the treatise, Pseudo-Dionysius instructs his student, Timothy, to completely abandon all sensory and intellectual faculties. To find the source of existence, one must leave existence behind.

“Leave behind both sensible perceptions and intellectual efforts, and all objects of sense and intelligence, and all things not being and being, and be raised aloft unknowingly to the union… with Him Who is above every essence and knowledge.”

The Meaning: You cannot think your way to God. Just as you must step out of the light to see into a dark room, you must step out of human logic to experience the Divine.

2. The Metaphor of the Sculptor

How do you find something by removing things? Pseudo-Dionysius famously explains the Via Negativa using the imagery of a marble sculptor.

“…denying or removing all things that are… like men who, carving a statue out of marble, remove all the impediments that hinder the clear perception of the latent image and by this mere removal display the hidden statue itself in its hidden beauty.”

The Meaning: Kataphatic (positive) theology keeps throwing more clay onto the sculpture, calling God “king,” “judge,” or “father”. Apophatic theology takes a chisel and chips those concepts away. By subtracting your human descriptions, you reveal the raw, unadulterated reality that was always hidden beneath.

3. The “Brilliant Darkness” Paradox

Pseudo-Dionysius frequently uses the language of sensory contradiction to break the mind’s rigid categories. His most famous concept is the “Divine Dark”.

“Lead us up beyond unknowing and light… where the mysteries of God’s Word lie simple, absolute and unchangeable in the brilliant darkness of a hidden silence.”

“The Divine Dark is nought else but that inaccessible light wherein the Lord is said to dwell.”

The Meaning: Why call it “darkness”? It is not dark because it lacks light; it is dark because it has too much light. It is blinding. The “darkness” is simply the human intellect short-circuiting when faced with an overwhelming infinity

4. The Ultimate Climax of Negation

In the final chapter of The Mystical Theology, the text devolves into a rhythmic, rapid-fire list of denials. The author strips God of every possible theological, philosophical, and biblical concept.

“The Ultimate Cause is… not soul, not mind… It is not greatness, not smallness… It is not power, not light, not living, not life, not being, not eternity, not time… It is not sonhood, not fatherhood… There is neither logos, name, or knowledge of it.”

The Meaning: The text ends by declaring that God is not even “One,” not even “God,” and not even “Truth”. Pseudo-Dionysius arrives at absolute silence. By stripping away even the holiest words, the seeker stops worshiping their own ideas about the Divine and finally rests directly in the reality itself.

Neti, Neti and the West.

The Hindu concept of Neti Neti (Sanskrit: नेति नेति) represents the exact Eastern equivalent to Western apophatic theology. Meaning “not this, not that,” it is a core meditative and philosophical practice found in the Upanishads (the foundational scriptures of Hinduism) and heavily emphasized in the school of Advaita Vedanta (Non-Dualism).

Just like Pseudo-Dionysius and Meister Eckhart, the ancient sages of India realized that language could only describe finite objects. Therefore, the absolute reality—called Brahman—can only be pointed to by methodically denying every physical and mental attribute.

1. The Scriptural Origin: The Brhadaranyaka UpanishadThe earliest and most famous appearance of Neti Neti occurs in the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad (dated around 700 BCE), where the sage Yajnavalkya explains the ultimate nature of reality.

“The description of Brahman is ‘Neti Neti’ (not this, not that); for there is no other and more appropriate description than this… It is neither coarse nor fine, neither short nor long… It has no eyes, no ears, no speech, no mind, no breath, no mouth, and no measure.” — Chapter 2.3.6 / 3.8.8

The Cross-Cultural Connection: This text performs the exact same linguistic surgery as Pseudo-Dionysius’s final chapter. By declaring that Brahman is neither “short nor long” and has “no mind,” the text forces the seeker to stop projecting human qualities onto the cosmos.

2. The Mechanics of the Method: Stripping the Ego

In Hindu practice, Neti Neti is not just an abstract philosophy; it is an active meditation tool used to discover the true self (Atman), which is identical to the universal absolute (Brahman). A meditator sits in silence and systematically discards every layer of their identity:

“I am not this physical body” (the body changes, decays, and dies).
“I am not these emotions” (anger, joy, and fear come and go).
“I am not these thoughts or memories” (they are just passing mental data).
“I am not my profession, gender, or name.”

The Cross-Cultural Connection: This maps perfectly onto Meister Eckhart’s concept of Gelassenheit (radical detachment). Eckhart argued that you must strip away all images of yourself to find the “divine spark” (grunt). In Hinduism, once you say “not this, not that” to every object of experience, what remains is the pure, unattached Witness—the ultimate Self.

3. Ultimate Reality as Beyond Existence and Non-Existence

Eastern texts take the linguistic breakdown a step further by denying even basic philosophical categories like “being” and “non-being.” The Bhagavad Gita highlights this paradox:

“I shall now declare unto you that which ought to be known… It is the supreme Brahman, who is without beginning, and who is said to be neither Being (Sat) nor Non-Being (Asat).” — Chapter 13.12

The Cross-Cultural Connection: When the Gita states that Brahman is neither “existence nor non-existence,” it mirrors the highest peak of Western mysticism. This is identical to Pseudo-Dionysius declaring that God is “above all things being and not being,” and Eckhart calling the Godhead a “nothingness.

Summary of the Shared Framework

Element	Western Via Negativa	Hindu Neti Neti
The Target	The Nameless Godhead (Gottheit)	The Attribute-less Absolute (Nirguna Brahman)
The Process	Radical Subtraction (Chiseling the marble)	Systematic Negation (“Not this, not that”)
The Trap	Idolatry of mental concepts and dogmas	Identification with the ego and material world
The Result	Silent, non-dual union with the Divine Ground	Awakening to pure Consciousness (Chit)

The Via Negativa of Mystical Language that Blocks the Mind.

Speaking in tongues (glossolalia) and Gnostic vowel sound vibratory chanting are deeply connected as ecstatic, non-semantic spiritual languages designed to bypass the rational mind and commune directly with the transcendent.

While modern glossolalia is heavily associated with Pentecostal Christianity, historians and linguists trace the underlying phenomenon of ecstatic vocalization back to ancient Greek mystery cults, early Christian heretical movements, and Gnostic schools.

1. The Core Principle: Bypassing Human Language

Both glossolalia and Gnostic chanting operate on the foundational premise of apophatic theology (the negative way): human words are too small for the Divine.

Glossolalia relies on the fluid vocalization of speech-like syllables that lack recognizable semantic grammar or vocabulary. The speaker drops self-conscious control, allowing the vocal organs to pour forth raw sound.
Gnostic Chanting rejects standard words altogether in favor of pure vowels (alpha, epsilon, eta, iota, omicron, upsilon, omega). Gnostics believed that standard human dialects belonged to the flawed, physical world created by the Demiurge. To communicate with the true, nameless Godhead beyond this world, one had to strip language down to its absolute acoustic essence: the unconstrained vowel

2. Gnostic Vowel Strings as “Textual” Glossolalia

When the Nag Hammadi Library was discovered in 1945, scholars found bizarre strings of repetitive, rhythmic vowels embedded within holy prayers.

For example, in the Sethian Gnostic text The Gospel of the Egyptians, prayers unexpectedly break away from Greek or Coptic sentences into raw, ecstatic typography:

“I praise You. I call your Name that is hidden within me: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU…“

Scholars frequently describe these strings as an ancient, written form of glossolalia. They were not meant to be read silently for intellectual meaning; they were vocal scores meant to be chanted out loud until the practitioner entered an altered, trance-like state of consciousness.

3. Cosmic Harmony and Sonic Vibrations

Where modern Pentecostal glossolalia emphasizes the emotional descent of the Holy Spirit into the believer, Gnostic vocalizations were viewed as a precise metaphysical science of vibration.

The Seven Planetary Spheres: In Gnostic cosmology, the soul is trapped on Earth and must ascend past seven archontic planetary spheres to return to the divine realm (the Pleroma). Gnostics assigned one of the seven Greek vowels to each of the cosmic spheres (e.g., Alpha to the Moon, Iota to the Sun, Omega to Saturn).
Sympathetic Resonance: By vibrating these specific vowel sounds at precise frequencies, the Gnostic initiate believed they were creating a sympathetic acoustic resonance with the universe. The vibration literally acted as a sonic key to unlock the heavenly gates and shield the ascending soul from hostile cosmic rulers

4. The Cross-Cultural Shift: Western Mantras

Linguistically, Gnostic vowel vibrations function exactly like Eastern mantras, such as the Hindu and Buddhist “Om/Aum” chant or the Sufi “HU”.

By continuously vibrating a single vowel sound (like the “Ah,” “Oom,” or “Ee”), the human body acts as a resonating chamber. This intensely focused vocalization triggers neurological shifts—specifically decreasing activity in the brain’s frontal lobes (the centers for ego and language control)—allowing a deep state of meditation, identical to the neurological shifts observed in modern glossolalia.

Listen to an evocative interpretation of traditional Gnostic chanting structures, which mirrors the rhythmic, non-semantic nature of ecstatic vocalizations:

Montanism

Montanism, known to its 2nd-century adherents as the “New Revelation,” was a charismatic revival movement that served as the primary battleground over ecstatic speech in the early Church. Founded by a self-proclaimed prophet named Montanus and two prominent prophetesses, Priscilla and Maximilla, the movement fiercely championed glossolalia and ecstatic prophecy.

Their practices directly triggered the early Church’s first institutional synods and accelerated the closing of the biblical canon to suppress these outbursts

1. The Nature of Montanist Ecstasy

Unlike traditional biblical prophecy where the prophet remained coherent and conscious, Montanist prophecy was characterized by an abnormal, frenzied ecstasy. [1, 2]

The Passive Instrument: Montanus taught that a prophet was merely a passive musical instrument played by the Holy Spirit. He recorded the Spirit as saying: “Behold, the human being is like a lyre, and I fly over it like a plectrum.”
Frenzied Glossolalia: The 4th-century church historian Eusebius recorded that Montanus would suddenly fall into a state of “abnormal ecstasy,” whereupon he would become frenzied and begin to “babble and utter strange sounds”. This ecstatic, non-semantic language was viewed by followers as the direct, raw utterance of the Paraclete (Holy Spirit)

2. Why Orthodoxy Clashed with the “New Revelation”

The early Church authorities did not necessarily object to the moral life of the Montanists—who were famously strict ascetics, fast-keepers, and embraced martyrdom—but they were terrified of the theological chaos of unregulated glossolalia.

Superseding Scripture: The primary heresy of Montanism was the claim that their ecstatic utterances provided continuous, fresh revelation that could supersede the teachings of Jesus or Paul.
The Ego-Dissolution Shock: Orthodox leaders were horrified that Montanus, Priscilla, and Maximilla spoke in the first person as God. Montanus would cry out, “I am the Lord God, the Almighty, who abide in man,” while Maximilla proclaimed, “I am speech and spirit and power.” To the developing hierarchy of bishops, this total dissolution of the human ego looked less like divine inspiration and more like demonic possession.
Pagan Resemblance: Church critics pointed out that Montanus was a former priest of the pagan goddess Cybele. They argued that his thrashing, ecstatic tongue-speaking mirrored the wild, irrational states of pagan Roman oracles rather than the sober, alert delivery of Christian prophecy.

3. The Structural Consequence: Shutting Down the Charisma

The clash with Montanism fundamentally altered the architecture of Western Christianity. To combat the spread of the movement, the orthodox Church took aggressive institutional measures:

[ Montanist Ecstatic Outbursts ]
│
▼
[ First Church Synods Called ] ──► (Excommunicated the movement around 177 CE)
│
▼
[ Institutional Consolidation ] ──► (Shifted authority from fluid “prophets” to local “bishops”)
│
▼
[ Closure of the New Testament ] ──► (Declared that public revelation was officially complete)

By defining the New Testament canon, the Church firmly established that God’s authoritative word was locked in historical text, effectively declaring that any subsequent “new revelations” or ecstatic babblings were unauthorized.

4. The Gnostic vs. Montanist Contrast

While both Gnostics (with their vowel-vibrations) and Montanists (with their glossolalia) bypassed standard language, they had completely opposite spiritual goals:

The Gnostics approached sound as a metaphysical science. They mathematically used specific vowel combinations as cosmic keys to ascending past hostile rulers to reach the silent Godhead.
The Montanists approached sound as an apocalyptic surrender. They did not care about cosmic maps; they believed the world was ending imminently and that their bodies were physical vessels being violently overridden by the Holy Spirit

The Defection of Tertullian – Choosing to Become a Holy Roller.

The defection of Tertullian (c. 155–220 CE)—the brilliant, fiercely logical “Father of Latin Christianity”—to the Montanist movement around 207 CE remains one of the most stunning plot twists in early Church history.

Tertullian was the supreme champion of the orthodox Church in Carthage, North Africa. He was a trained Roman rhetorician who weaponized his legal intellect to destroy heresies, famously coined the Latin term for the Trinity (Trinitas), and laid the groundwork for Western systematic theology. Yet, the very man who defended the institutional Church chose to walk away from it to join what the bishops considered an erratic, ecstatic, tongue-speaking sect.

His departure was not caused by a sudden loss of intellectual reason, but by his obsession with moral extremism, spiritual power, and a rejection of institutional compromise.

1. The Core Motive: Rage Against Institutional “Laxity”

Tertullian was a radical purist who believed that the institutional Church was becoming worldly, corrupt, and soft.

As the 2nd century turned into the 3rd, the mainstream Church was beginning to regularize its institutional processes. Bishops began granting absolution (forgiveness) for major sins like adultery or surviving Roman persecution by denying Christ. To Tertullian, this compromise was an unforgivable betrayal of holiness.

The Montanists, by contrast, practiced a brutal, uncompromising moralism. They demanded continuous fasting, forbade second marriages entirely, and commanded believers to actively seek out martyrdom rather than flee Roman arrest. Tertullian found their intense austerity completely aligned with his own psychological craving for an unblemished, radical faith.

2. Charisma vs. Office (The Holy Spirit over the Bishop)

Tertullian grew deeply disillusioned by a Church run by administrators rather than spiritually alive prophets.

The Orthodox Shift: The mainstream Church was shifting authority to the Office of the Bishop to preserve stability. They argued that because public revelation was closed, the Holy Spirit spoke strictly through the unbroken line of church offices.
The Montanist Appeal: The Montanists claimed that the Paraclete (the Holy Spirit) was actively shouting through new prophets in real-time. Tertullian eagerly embraced this. He did not view Montanism as a brand-new religion, but as the long-awaited “Age of the Spirit” that would finalize Christian maturity. He believed the raw, ecstatic glossolalia and prophecies were proof that the living God was overriding human structures.

3. The Great Rhetorical Insult: Psychici vs. Pneumatici

Once Tertullian aligned with the Montanists, he turned his famously sharp, vicious pen against his former orthodox colleagues. He divided the Christian world into two distinct biological and spiritual classes:

The Psychici (The Soulish/Animal Men): This was his new, derogatory term for the orthodox mainstream Christians. He mocked them as domestic, fleshy, lazy believers who cared more about church politics, comfort, and regular meals than the searing fire of the Spirit.
The Pneumatici (The Spiritual Men): This was his term for the Montanists. These were the true, elite, spirit-filled believers who fasted constantly, spoke in tongues, received fresh revelations, and were eager to shed their blood for Christ.

(Note the irony: Tertullian borrowed this exact phraseology from the Gnostics, whom he had spent the first half of his career trying to socially destroy)

4. An Unending Quest for Extremism

What makes Tertullian’s shift even more dramatic is that even the Montanists were ultimately not strict enough for him.

Around 213 CE, Tertullian apparently broke away from the mainstream Montanist movement. He found their discipline slipping, so he founded his own ultra-radical, hyper-ascetic splinter sect in Carthage known appropriately as the Tertullianists. This faction was so severe in its moral demands that it survived as an isolated pocket in North Africa until the 5th century, when Saint Augustine finally absorbed the last remaining members back into the Catholic Church.

The Ultimate Historical Irony

Because Tertullian died outside of communion with the mainstream Church, he was never canonized as a Saint—a bizarre fate for the very theologian who gave Western Christianity its defining vocabulary. Every time modern Christians use the word “Trinity”, they are quoting a brilliant defector who abandoned the institutional Church because he believed it lacked the raw, chaotic power of ecstatic spiritual manifestation.

The Greek Magical Papyri

The Greek Magical Papyri (known to scholars as the PGM, from the Latin Papyri Graecae Magicae) are a massive collection of sorcery manuals, spells, and ritual texts discovered in the Egyptian desert dating from the 2nd century BCE to the 5th century CE.

These papyri represent the exact physical crossroads where Gnosticism, Greek paganism, Egyptian temple magic, and early Christian mysticism fused. Within these texts, the use of vowel constellations—strings of repeating Greek vowels (α ε η ι ο υ ω)—shifts from a purely philosophical idea into an active, written technology of vocal sorcery and glossolalia.

1. The Visual Geometry of the Vowels

In the PGM, vowels were not just written in standard sentences; they were arranged into geometric shapes meant to trap cosmic power or visually map the universe. Magicians wrote them in structures called klimata (ladders), pterygia (wings), or pyramids.

Visual Example of a Vowel Pyramid in PGM Spells:

       α
      ε ε
     η η η
    ι ι ι ι
   ο ο ο ο ο
  υ υ υ υ υ υ
 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω

The Function: By reading this structure out loud, the practitioner’s voice would physically expand or contract, shifting from a single high note down to a deep, resonant rumble. This vocal scaling was used to invoke the supreme, nameless gods of the cosmos by vibrating through their entire structural spectrum.

2. The Seven Vowels as Seven Cosmic Notes

To the magicians who compiled the PGM, the seven vowels of the Greek alphabet were deeply connected to Hellenistic astrology, Pythagorean music theory, and Gnostic cosmology. Each vowel represented a specific planetary sphere:

Α (Alpha): The Moon 🌙
Ε (Epsilon): Mercury ☿
Η (Eta): Venus ♀
Ι (Iota): The Sun ☉
Ο (Omicron): Mars ♂
Υ (Upsilon): Jupiter ♃
Ω (Omega): Saturn ♄

The Ritual: When a spell in the PGM commands a sorcerer to shout “ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ”, the magician is not speaking an ancient gibberish word. They are playing a “cosmic chord,” vibrating the frequencies of all seven planetary rulers simultaneously to bypass their cosmic gatekeepers—exactly matching the Gnostic soul’s ascent through the Archontic spheres.

3. Concrete Textual Examples from the PGM

The papyri are littered with instructions telling the practitioner exactly how to vibrate these vowel strings to achieve altered states of consciousness.

The Mithras Liturgy (PGM IV. 475-829)

This famous ritual in the papyri describes the ascent of the soul into divine light. The text suddenly abandons Greek sentences and provides strict musical and physical instructions for vowel glossolalia:

“Draw in breath from the divine rays three times, as deeply as you can… and say: ‘I E O O O I E O O O O I E E E O O O I I I O O O O O U U U U U Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω’. Draw in your breath, and make a clicking sound… bellow like a bull, then hiss like a snake.”

Spell for Acquiring a Daimon Companion (PGM I. 42-195)

In this invocation, the magician uses strings of vowels as an “unutterable name” to force a divine spirit into the physical room:

“I call upon you, the greatest god, eternal lord… ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ ΩΥΟΙΗΕΑ. Come to me, reveal yourself, by your holy and unutterable names: ΑΩ ΗΩ ΙΩ ΟΩ ΥΩ!”

4. The Linguistic Connection to Glossolalia

Linguists and historians of religion note that the PGM provides the closest historical bridge between Gnostic vowel chanting and Christian speaking in tongues.

The texts frequently label these vowel strings as Voces Magicae (magical voices) or Asēmos Logos (meaningless/un-signified speech). They recognized that the moment human language is stripped of its literal, semantic meaning and reduced to raw acoustic vibration, it transforms from a tool used to talk about the world into a psychological trigger used to directly experience the divine source.

Breathing Techniques of the Greek Magical Papyri.

In the Greek Magical Papyri (PGM), breathing was treated as a rigorous, somatic technology used to channel cosmic energy. Practitioners did not just chant words; they manipulated their lungs, throat, and abdominal muscles to alter their physiological state and generate specific acoustic frequencies.

The primary technique for this was known as pneuma drawing (pneuma helkein), a method of inhaling and exhaling divine breath (pneuma) to charge the body before releasing it as a vocal vibration.

The PGM outlines four distinct, highly specific breathing and vocalization techniques.

1. The Pneuma Draw (Pneuma Helkein)

The texts frequently instruct the magician to “draw in breath from the divine rays” or from the open air. This was a deep, deliberate, and often rhythmic inhalation meant to pull the invisible spirit or life force of the universe directly into the internal organs.

The Mechanics: The practitioner stood facing a specific cardinal direction (often East toward the rising sun) and took three deep, diaphragmatic inhalations through the nose or mouth.
The Ritual Goal: By packing the lungs with pneuma, the magician was literally inflating their human biology with divine power. The breath acted as the fuel or gunpowder; the vowel chant that followed was the projectile.

2. The Pop or Click (Poppysmos)

Once the breath was drawn, the exhalation often began with a sharp, non-lexical acoustic trigger called a poppysmos (ποππυσμός).

The Mechanics: This involved a rapid clicking, smacking, or popping sound made by pressing the lips or tongue tightly together and releasing them sharply with a burst of air.
The Ritual Goal: In texts like the Mithras Liturgy (PGM IV), this sound was used to stun or command lesser elemental spirits. It acted as an abrupt, violent energetic discharge that cracked open the threshold between the mundane world and the spirit realm.

3. Hissing (Syrigmos)

After the sharp click, the magician would often regulate the outflow of their breath into a long, continuous hiss, known as a syrigmos (συριγμός).

The Mechanics: The practitioner forced the exhaled air through a tight seal of the teeth and lips (creating a sharp “Sssss” or “Shhhh” sound).
The Ritual Goal: In the ancient world, the hiss was the sonic signature of the serpent. Because deities like Helios, IAO, and various Egyptian gods were associated with solar serpents or dragons (like the Agathodaemon), the hiss was a method of vocal shape-shifting. By matching the acoustic frequency of a serpent, the magician achieved sympathetic resonance with those specific cosmic forces

4. Bellowing (Mykesis)

The final, most physically intense stage of the respiratory ritual was the mykesis (μύκησις)—a deep, guttural bellow or roar.

The Mechanics: The magician dropped their jaw, widened their throat, and forced the remaining air out from the very bottom of their abdomen. The text literally commands the sorcerer to “bellow like a bull” or low from the stomach.
The Ritual Goal: This was the physical delivery system for the long strings of planetary vowels (ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ). The deep roaring vibration shook the chest cavity and larynx, maximizing the acoustic volume and physical resonance of the vowels. It was designed to echo through the ritual space and violently command the Archons (cosmic rulers) to open their heavenly gates.

[ Step 1: Pneuma Draw ] ──► Inhale deeply 3 times to gather divine energy.
│
▼
[ Step 2: Poppysmos ] ──► Snap the lips/tongue to shatter the veil.
│
▼
[ Step 3: Syrigmos ] ──► Exhale a long, low hiss to evoke the solar serpent.
│
▼
[ Step 4: Mykesis ] ──► Bellow the vowel strings from the depths of the belly.

By transitioning the breath from a deep inhale to a sharp snap, a thin hiss, and finally a thunderous vocal roar, the magician used their own respiratory tract as a musical instrument to vibrate through every level of the cosmic hierarchy.

The somatic breathing techniques found in the Greek Magical Papyri evolved and were fundamentally re-engineered centuries later by Christian monks in the Eastern Orthodox tradition. This contemplative, meditative practice is known as Hesychasm (from the Greek hesychia, meaning “stillness” or “silence”). 1. The Jesus Prayer as a Christian Mantr

Where the PGM sorcerer chanted strings of vowels (AEHIOYW) to align with planetary spheres, the Hesychast monk continuously repeats a single formula known as the Jesus Prayer:

“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”

Linguistically, this functions exactly like the vowel constellations or Eastern mantras. By repeating this short phrase thousands of times a day, the words eventually lose their analytical, discursive meaning. The brain stops “thinking about” the sentence, and the prayer transitions into a continuous acoustic rhythm that quietens the rational mind (the nous), paving the way for apophatic stillness.

Developed primarily between the 4th and 14th centuries by the Desert Fathers and the monks of Mount Athos, Hesychasm uses a precise system of physical posture, breath synchronization, and vocal repetition.

While its theological purpose is entirely different from the sorcery of the PGM, the underlying physiological and linguistic mechanics are remarkably similar.

The Jesus Prayer as Mantra

1. The Jesus Prayer as a Christian Mantra

Where the PGM sorcerer chanted strings of vowels (AEHIOYW) to align with planetary spheres, the Hesychast monk continuously repeats a single formula known as the Jesus Prayer:

“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”

AI Mode Conversation: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckharts philophy of religion

You said: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

Core Ideas of Eckhart’s Negative Way

Beyond Human Speech: Words like “good,” “wise,” or “love” limit God, so Eckhart famously prayed to be “rid of God,” meaning rid of the mental box of who God is. [1]
The Godhead (Gottheit): The ultimate reality is a radical, silent dark void or “nothingness” out of which the personal God emerges, meaning God precedes all categories of being. [1, 2, 3]
Letting Go (Gelassenheit): To experience this divine depth, a person must let go of all attached images, ego desires, and worldly constructs, emptying the soul so God can act within. [1, 2, 3]
The Divine Spark (Unteilet): Deep within the silent, emptied soul lies a pure spark (grunt) that is identical with the unnamable Godhead. [1]

Why Eckhart Emphasized Negation

Protects Transcendence: It stops humans from turning God into a giant physical or psychological object.
Shifts Practice: Moves religion away from just following external rules or intellectual belief into an experiential, silent encounter with mystery.
Overcomes Paradox: It forces the mind past normal logic, recognizing that God is simultaneously nothing and everything.
Explore a brief overview of negative theology on Wikipedia.
Read about the definitions on Encyclopedia.com.
Review a detailed study from Cambridge Core. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

If you’d like, I can:

Compare the Via Negativa to Eckhart’s contrasting Via Positiva (positive way)
Explore how this relates to Eastern mystical traditions like Buddhism or Daoism

12 sites

Eckhart on the God of Creation and the Nameless God of MysteryWe cannot name God who “is higher than names or nature” and when we try to put a name on God, “then it is not God.” God is bigger …Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox
“Thou Shalt Dare the Dark” (Via Negativa) – Daily Meditations with Matthew FoxThe Via Negativa is a path of darkness, silence, and solitude. It also includes pain, letting go, and letting be. The commandment …Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox
Celebrating the ineffable – Science MusingsBut with Eckhart’s via positiva there is also a via negativa. God is not this and is not that. God is unknown and unnamable, a mys…Science Musings

Show all

Explore how this relates to Eastern mystical traditions like Buddhism or Daoism

1. Buddhism (Zen and Madhyamaka)

The Concept of Emptiness: Eckhart’s description of the Godhead as a “silent void” or “nothingness” mirrors the Buddhist concept of Śūnyatā (emptiness). [1, 2, 3, 4]
Not Lack, but Potential: Neither Eckhart’s “nothing” nor Buddhist “emptiness” means a blank void of non-existence; instead, it is a reality so full of potential that no single form can define it. [1, 2, 3]
Stripping the Ego: Eckhart’s Gelassenheit (detachment/letting go) functions exactly like the Buddhist practice of dissolving the illusion of the ego (Anatta) to end suffering and realize true nature. [1]
Beyond Logic: Just as Eckhart uses paradox to break the intellect, Zen Buddhism utilizes koans (riddles with no logical answer) to force the mind past dualistic, rational thought. [1]

2. Daoism (Philosophical Daoism)

The Unnamable Source: The opening line of the Dao De Jing (“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao”) mirrors Eckhart’s view that any God you can name is not the true Godhead. [1, 2, 3]
Actionless Action: Daoism emphasizes Wu Wei (effortless action or non-doing), which directly aligns with Eckhart’s ideal of a detached soul acting “without a why” (ohne Warum), purely out of its own nature. [1, 2, 3]
The Primal Darkness: Both traditions use the imagery of darkness to represent ultimate reality—Ehkart speaks of the “silent darkness” of the Godhead, while Daoism refers to the Dao as the dark, mysterious womb of the universe. [1]

Key Difference: The Ground of Being

If you are interested, we can expand on this by:

Looking at specific quotes from Eckhart alongside passages from the Dao De Jing
Exploring how modern philosophers (like the Kyoto School in Japan) used Eckhart to bridge East and West [1]

23 sites

Meister Eckhart’s Mysticism in Comparison with Zen BuddhismNov 23, 2022 — In this way, through Meister Eckhart’s thought, “without why,” and the Zen example, “no meaning,” one can establish an exact corre…Taylor & Francis Online
Midterm Review Questions Flashcards1. There are three major models of ultimate reality. Which of the three models supports the claim that right and wrong do not exis…Quizlet
“The Poetry of Wang Wei” | Open IndianaAfter coming into contact with the literature and sūtras on prajñā and śūnyatā then circulating, they ( The cultured elite of sout…Indiana University Bloomington

Show all

Looking at specific quotes from Eckhart alongside passages from the Dao De Jing

1. The Nameless Absolute

Both traditions insist that human concepts and language completely fail to capture ultimate reality. Giving the Divine a label or definition instantly turns it into something limited. [1, 2]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 1)
“As the Godhead is nameless, and all naming is alien to Him, so also the soul is nameless; for it is here the same as God.”	“The Way that can be spoken of is not the constant Way; The name that can be named is not the constant name.”

2. Radical Subtraction vs. Desires

To experience this ultimate source, both mystics teach that a human must radically empty their mind, stripping away mental concepts, expectations, and personal desires. [1]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 1)
“God is not found in the soul by adding anything, but by a process of subtraction.” “Any object you have in your mind, however good, will be a barrier between you and the inmost Truth.”	“Hence always rid yourself of desires in order to observe its secrets.” “In the pursuit of the Dao, every day something is dropped.”

3. Living “Without a Why” (Wu Wei)

The ultimate spiritual lifestyle in both philosophies is to act spontaneously from your true nature, completely free of transactional motives or calculating goals. [1]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 2)
“If you ask a genuine person who acts from his own ground: ‘Why are you doing what you are doing?’… he would say: ‘I do it because I do it.’“ “Perform all of your deeds without whys and wherefores.”	“The Sage manages affairs without action (wu wei) and conveys instructions without words.” “The Dao never acts, yet nothing is left undone.”

4. Ultimate Reality as Ultimate Silence

Both paths point to absolute stillness and quiet as the most accurate earthly reflection of the cosmic source. [1]

Meister Eckhart	Laozi (Dao De Jing, Chapter 25)
“There is nothing so much like God in all the universe as silence.”	“There was something undefined and complete, coming into existence before Heaven and Earth. How still it was and formless!”

If you’d like to dive deeper, we can look at:

The shared imagery of the “Womb” or “Birth” (Eckhart’s Birth of the Word in the Soul vs. Laozi’s Dao as the Mother of the World)
How these concepts directly influenced modern thinkers like Alan Watts or D.T. Suzuki [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

12 sites

Use These Eckhart Tolle and Tao te Ching Quotes … – MediumDec 31, 2020 — Eckhart’s quote is reminiscent of another found in Lao Tzu’s sage book the Tao te Ching. From Chapter 44: “Be content with what yo…Medium·David Gerken
Meister Eckhart – Tao Te ChingQuotes by Meister Eckhart (28 quotes) * “A free mind is one which is untroubled and unfettered by anything, which has not bound it…laotzu.xyz
道德經- Dao De Jing道德經: 有物混成，先天地生。寂兮寥兮，獨立不改，周行而不殆，可以為天下母。吾不知其名，字之曰道，強為之名曰大。大曰逝，逝曰遠，遠曰反。故道大，天大，地大，王亦大。域中有四大，而王居其一焉。人法地，地法天，天法道，道法自然。 … There w…Chinese Text Project

Show all

The shared imagery of the “Womb” or “Birth” (Eckhart’s Birth of the Word in the Soul vs. Laozi’s Dao as the Mother of the World)

1. The Divine Womb: A Void That Bears Fruit

For both mystics, ultimate reality is a paradox. It is completely empty of physical forms, yet it acts as a cosmic womb teeming with limitless, creative potential. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Meister Eckhart: He refers to the innermost core of the human soul as a “silent middle” or a deep “ground” (Grund). This inner space must be completely stripped of all mental images, memories, and worldly desires. Once it is rendered completely empty, it becomes a receptive womb where God births the Divine Word (Logos). [1, 2, 3, 4]
Laozi: The Dao De Jing explicitly frames the Dao using maternal vocabulary, calling it the “Great Mother” and the “Mysterious Female”.“The Tao never dies; It is a deep womb. And the opening of the womb is called the root of heaven and earth.” — Chapter 6 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

2. The Unceasing Birth: An Eternal Process

Neither mystic views birth as a single, historical event that happened long ago. Instead, creation is an unceasing, present-moment reality. [1, 2]

Meister Eckhart: He argues that the historical birth of Christ in Bethlehem matters little unless that same birth happens inside you today.“This birth which takes place unceasingly in eternity is the very same birth which has taken place within human nature.” [1, 2]
Laozi: The Dao does not simply create the universe and walk away. It acts as a continuous life force, pushing and nourishing all things to grow according to their internal nature.“The world had a beginning, and this beginning could be the mother of the world. When you know the mother, go to know the child.” — Chapter 52 [1, 2, 3]

3. Spiritual Attainment: Returning to the Source

Meister Eckhart: To allow the Birth of the Word to happen, the soul must “withdraw from all things” and return to its primal, uncreated state. Eckhart calls this “God returning to God”—the soul shedding its ego to slide back into the divine womb of the Godhead.
Laozi: True wisdom is knowing the individual things of the earth, but consciously choosing to cling tightly to the maternal source.“All things issue from it; all things return to it. To find the origin, trace back the manifestations. When you recognize the children and find The Mother, you will be free of sorrow.” — Chapter 25/52 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

If you want to continue this analysis, let me know if you would like to:

Explore how these ideas influenced modern psychology (like Carl Jung’s concepts of the collective unconscious and the “anima”)
Look at how both traditions view the concept of “The Infant” as a symbol of perfect spiritual purity [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

30 sites

“The spirit that never dies is called the mysterious feminine …Jun 30, 2026 — 通向这个无比幽深的生殖之源的门径，就是这个天地世界的根本。它绵延存在而又若有若无，它施展的作用无穷无尽。 The Dao is the mother of all things. She is the “spirit of the valley” who…Facebook·Dr. Wayne W. Dyer
Probing the Depths of Evil and Good | Lafayette TodayApr 29, 2021 — Godhead as the Ungrund (non-ground), compatible with Bud- dhist Emptiness? Eckhart prayed to be delivered from “God” in order to a…Lafayette Today
Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi 0791441121 …2 All of these things come forth from the Dao in the way that babies emerge from the womb. In saying that the Way is a “personal r…dokumen.pub

Show all

How these concepts directly influenced modern thinkers like Alan Watts or D.T. Suzuk

1. D.T. Suzuki: Eckhart as the “Zen Master” of the West

The Godhead as Prajñā (Transcendental Wisdom): Suzuki mapped Eckhart’s distinction between “God” and the “Godhead” directly onto the Buddhist relationship between form and emptiness. He explained that Eckhart’s “nameless nothingness” was the exact equivalent of Zen’s “original formless mind”. [1, 2]
“The Eye with Which I See God”: Suzuki was deeply fascinated by Eckhart’s famous quote: “The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me.” Suzuki utilized this to explain Buddhist non-duality (Advaya), illustrating that there is no separate “seeker” looking at a distant “Divine object”—the act of pure awareness is one unified event. [1, 2]

2. Alan Watts: Deconstructing the Cosmic “Ego”

The Divine Womb as the Ground of Being: Watts often criticized the Western view of God as an aggressive, external “architect” or “monarch.” To challenge this, he used Laozi’s concept of the Dao as a mother womb along with Eckhart’s concept of the divine “ground” (Grund). Watts taught that humans are not “made” by a separate God like clay pots; rather, we are “birthed” out of the universe like leaves from a tree. [1, 2, 3]
The Psychology of Detachment (Gelassenheit): Watts heavily integrated Eckhart’s Via Negativa into his critiques of modern ego anxiety. He noted that trying to “force” yourself to be spiritual or moral was counterproductive. Instead, Watts taught that by practicing Eckhartian subtraction—dropping the ego’s illusion of control—a person naturally slides into Wu Wei (spontaneous, effortless action). [1]

The Lasting Impact

By using Eckhart as a cultural anchor, Suzuki and Watts achieved two massive philosophical breakthroughs:

Normalized Eastern Thought: They proved that Zen and Daoism were not “bizarre, exotic Asian mysteries,” but matched the highest peaks of Western contemplative theology.
Revived Western Mysticism: They helped modern Westerners rediscover their own forgotten mystical lineage, introducing a generation of seekers to the deep, silent current of Christian apophatic theology. [1]

If you are interested, we can look into:

How these concepts influenced the Kyoto School of Philosophy, which formally blended Eckhart with Buddhist metaphysics
How the psychological side of these ideas influenced Carl Jung’s concept of the unconscious depth of the self [1]

12 sites

Today we honor the birthday of Alan Watts, a philosopher and …Jan 6, 2026 — But waking up is only half the path. The other half is growing up: emotional maturity, shadow work, ethics, embodiment, and the lo…0:31Facebook·Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS)
D. T. Suzuki: Ideas and InfluencesSep 15, 2022 — D. T. Suzuki (1870–1966) was a scholar who published extensively in Japanese and English and achieved international recognition as…Oxford University Press
Mysticism: Christian and Buddhist (Routledge Classics …If the Western world knows anything about Zen Buddhism, it is down to the efforts of one remarkable man, D.T. Suzuki. The twenty-s…Amazon.com

Show all

what is apophatic theology

Apophatic theology, also known as the Via Negativa (negative way), is a mystical approach to understanding the Divine by defining what God is not, rather than what God is. It asserts that the ultimate reality is far beyond human language, logic, and comprehension. Therefore, any positive description we give to God (like “wise,” “good,” or “powerful”) is fundamentally inaccurate because it limits something that is infinite. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Core Concepts of Apophatic Theology

Limitation of Language: Words can only describe things within human experience, making them entirely inadequate for describing the transcendent creator. [1, 2, 3]
Divine Incomprehensibility: The ultimate truth is a mystery so profound that it is often described using paradoxes, such as a “brilliant darkness” or a “fruitful nothingness.” [1]
Radical Subtraction: Spiritual growth is achieved not by acquiring more concepts or intellectual knowledge, but by stripping away mental constructs, images, and illusions. [1, 2]
Silent Encounter: True connection with the Divine happens in absolute stillness and quiet, where the rational mind surrenders to direct experience.

Apophatic vs. Kataphatic Theology

Christian tradition balances two contrasting paths to understanding the divine: [1, 2, 3]

Kataphatic Theology (Via Positiva): Uses positive assertions. It says, “God is love,” “God is light,” or “God is a father.” It relies on symbols, analogies, and scriptures to describe divine attributes. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Apophatic Theology (Via Negativa): Undoes those assertions. It says, “God is not love in any way humans understand love,” or “God is beyond light and darkness.” It serves as a necessary guard against idolatry, stopping humans from confusing their limited concepts with the true Absolute. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Major Thinkers and Traditions

Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite: A 5th-century Christian mystic whose writings laid the foundational framework for Christian apophaticism. [1, 2, 3]
Meister Eckhart: The medieval German philosopher who famously prayed to be “rid of God” so that he could experience the nameless, formless Godhead. [1, 2]
Eastern Orthodox Christianity: Unlike Western Christianity, which relies heavily on rational kataphatic theology, Eastern Orthodoxy prioritizes the apophatic approach, viewing God as fundamentally unknowable in His essence. [1, 2]
Global Parallels: While deeply rooted in Western monotheism, the apophatic mindset is structurally identical to the Hindu concept of Neti Neti (“not this, not that”) and the Daoist view of the unnamable Dao.

If you would like to explore further, let me know if we should:

Look at a historical text example, such as the writings of Pseudo-Dionysius
Discuss the Hindu concept of Neti Neti as a cross-cultural parallel [1, 2, 3]

31 sites

Apophatic theologyApophatic theology, also known as negative theology [1] and the Via Negativa, is a form of theological thinking and religious prac…Wikipedia
Apophaticism in Contemporary Philosophy | The Oxford Handbook of Apophatic Theology | Oxford AcademicJul 14, 2026 — Apophaticism is usually defined as the via negativa, “negative theology,” a method of describing God by negation, of obtaining kno…Oxford Academic
(PDF) Apophatic Bible VersesOct 10, 2024 — Apophatic, or “negative” theology, asserts that human beings can never fully grasp or describe the divine essence. Instead, we mus…ResearchGate

Show all

Look at a historical text example, such as the writings of Pseudo-Dionysius

The foundational text for Western apophatic theology is The Mystical Theology, a brief but revolutionary 5th-century treatise written by an anonymous Syrian monk known as Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. This text shaped the entire mystical trajectory of thinkers like Meister Eckhart by arguing that the closest a human can get to God is through radical “unknowing”. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Below are key textual examples from his work that demonstrate how apophatic theology operates in practice. [1]

1. The Call to Absolute Subtraction

“Leave behind both sensible perceptions and intellectual efforts, and all objects of sense and intelligence, and all things not being and being, and be raised aloft unknowingly to the union… with Him Who is above every essence and knowledge.” [1]

The Meaning: You cannot think your way to God. Just as you must step out of the light to see into a dark room, you must step out of human logic to experience the Divine. [1, 2, 3, 4]

2. The Metaphor of the Sculptor

How do you find something by removing things? Pseudo-Dionysius famously explains the Via Negativa using the imagery of a marble sculptor. [1, 2, 3]

“…denying or removing all things that are… like men who, carving a statue out of marble, remove all the impediments that hinder the clear perception of the latent image and by this mere removal display the hidden statue itself in its hidden beauty.” [1]

The Meaning: Kataphatic (positive) theology keeps throwing more clay onto the sculpture, calling God “king,” “judge,” or “father”. Apophatic theology takes a chisel and chips those concepts away. By subtracting your human descriptions, you reveal the raw, unadulterated reality that was always hidden beneath. [1, 2, 3]

3. The “Brilliant Darkness” Paradox

Pseudo-Dionysius frequently uses the language of sensory contradiction to break the mind’s rigid categories. His most famous concept is the “Divine Dark”. [1, 2]

“Lead us up beyond unknowing and light… where the mysteries of God’s Word lie simple, absolute and unchangeable in the brilliant darkness of a hidden silence.” [1]

“The Divine Dark is nought else but that inaccessible light wherein the Lord is said to dwell.” [1]

The Meaning: Why call it “darkness”? It is not dark because it lacks light; it is dark because it has too much light. It is blinding. The “darkness” is simply the human intellect short-circuiting when faced with an overwhelming infinity. [1, 2, 3]

4. The Ultimate Climax of Negation

“The Ultimate Cause is… not soul, not mind… It is not greatness, not smallness… It is not power, not light, not living, not life, not being, not eternity, not time… It is not sonhood, not fatherhood… There is neither logos, name, or knowledge of it.” [1]

The Meaning: The text ends by declaring that God is not even “One,” not even “God,” and not even “Truth”. Pseudo-Dionysius arrives at absolute silence. By stripping away even the holiest words, the seeker stops worshiping their own ideas about the Divine and finally rests directly in the reality itself. [1, 2, 3, 4]

To explore more of this lineage, look at the overview on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy or read selected translations on the Christian Classics Ethereal Library. [, 2]

If you would like to keep building this puzzle, let me know if we should:

Connect this text directly to the narrative of Moses climbing Mount Sinai into the cloud (which Pseudo-Dionysius uses as his primary template)
Transition to the Hindu concept of Neti Neti to see how Eastern texts handle this identical linguistic breakdown [1, 2]

15 sites

Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the AreopagiteApr 22, 2014 — um you might have a sense of who i was at 23 that that was my reaction to anything i didn’t know. about. um how could this can’t p…01:15:41YouTube·Harvard Divinity School
Pseudo-Dionysius the AreopagiteSep 6, 2004 — The four treatises are: 1) On the divine names (DN) (Peri theion onomaton, in Greek; De Divinis Nominibus, in Latin), the longest …Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apophatic Tradition Pt. 1: Gregory of Nyssa, Pseudo-Dionysius …Sep 28, 2020 — the saint vladimir seminary press has published an excellent anthology of gregory’s mystical writings under the title from glory t…1mYouTube·Contemplative Outreach

Show all

Transition to the Hindu concept of Neti Neti to see how Eastern texts handle this identical linguistic breakdown

1. The Scriptural Origin: The Brhadaranyaka Upanishad

The earliest and most famous appearance of Neti Neti occurs in the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad (dated around 700 BCE), where the sage Yajnavalkya explains the ultimate nature of reality. [1, 2]

“The description of Brahman is ‘Neti Neti’ (not this, not that); for there is no other and more appropriate description than this… It is neither coarse nor fine, neither short nor long… It has no eyes, no ears, no speech, no mind, no breath, no mouth, and no measure.” — Chapter 2.3.6 / 3.8.8

2. The Mechanics of the Method: Stripping the Ego

“I am not this physical body” (the body changes, decays, and dies).
“I am not these emotions” (anger, joy, and fear come and go).
“I am not these thoughts or memories” (they are just passing mental data).
“I am not my profession, gender, or name.” [1]

3. Ultimate Reality as Beyond Existence and Non-Existence

Eastern texts take the linguistic breakdown a step further by denying even basic philosophical categories like “being” and “non-being.” The Bhagavad Gita highlights this paradox:

“I shall now declare unto you that which ought to be known… It is the supreme Brahman, who is without beginning, and who is said to be neither Being (Sat) nor Non-Being (Asat).” — Chapter 13.12

Summary of the Shared Framework

Element	Western Via Negativa	Hindu Neti Neti
The Target	The Nameless Godhead (Gottheit)	The Attribute-less Absolute (Nirguna Brahman)
The Process	Radical Subtraction (Chiseling the marble)	Systematic Negation (“Not this, not that”)
The Trap	Idolatry of mental concepts and dogmas	Identification with the ego and material world
The Result	Silent, non-dual union with the Divine Ground	Awakening to pure Consciousness (Chit)

If you’d like to explore how this thread continues, let me know if we should:

Look at how Shankara (the great philosopher of Advaita Vedanta) formalized this into a rigorous school of logic
Discuss how this philosophy influenced the American Transcendentalists like Ralph Waldo Emerson [1, 2]

17 sites

Neti netiNeti Neti ( Sanskrit : नेति नेति) is a Sanskrit expression which means “not this, not that”, or “neither this, nor that” ( neti is…Wikipedia
What is Neti Neti? | HridayaNov 13, 2017 — This practice shows up in the Hindu tradition as a technique described in the Upanishads as neti neti—meaning “neither this nor th…Hridaya Yoga
“Neti Neti: A Key Teaching in Advaita Vedanta” | Sandeep Thakur posted on the topicJul 17, 2025 — “Neti Neti” is a Sanskrit phrase meaning “Not this, not this.” It is a key teaching in Advaita Vedanta, a school of Hindu philosop…LinkedIn

Show all

can you show how speaking in tonges and glossolalia relate to Gnostics with their vowel sound vibration

Speaking in tongues (glossolalia) and Gnostic vowel vibratory chanting are deeply connected as ecstatic, non-semantic spiritual languages designed to bypass the rational mind and commune directly with the transcendent. [1, 2, 3, 4]

1. The Core Principle: Bypassing Human Language

Both glossolalia and Gnostic chanting operate on the foundational premise of apophatic theology (the negative way): human words are too small for the Divine.

Glossolalia relies on the fluid vocalization of speech-like syllables that lack recognizable semantic grammar or vocabulary. The speaker drops self-conscious control, allowing the vocal organs to pour forth raw sound. [1, 2, 3]
Gnostic Chanting rejects standard words altogether in favor of pure vowels (alpha, epsilon, eta, iota, omicron, upsilon, omega). Gnostics believed that standard human dialects belonged to the flawed, physical world created by the Demiurge. To communicate with the true, nameless Godhead beyond this world, one had to strip language down to its absolute acoustic essence: the unconstrained vowel. [1, 2]

2. Gnostic Vowel Strings as “Textual” Glossolalia

When the Nag Hammadi Library was discovered in 1945, scholars found bizarre strings of repetitive, rhythmic vowels embedded within holy prayers. []

For example, in the Sethian Gnostic text The Gospel of the Egyptians, prayers unexpectedly break away from Greek or Coptic sentences into raw, ecstatic typography: [, 2]

“I praise You. I call your Name that is hidden within me: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU…“ []

3. Cosmic Harmony and Sonic Vibrations

Where modern Pentecostal glossolalia emphasizes the emotional descent of the Holy Spirit into the believer, Gnostic vocalizations were viewed as a precise metaphysical science of vibration. [1, 2]

The Seven Planetary Spheres: In Gnostic cosmology, the soul is trapped on Earth and must ascend past seven archontic planetary spheres to return to the divine realm (the Pleroma). Gnostics assigned one of the seven Greek vowels to each of the cosmic spheres (e.g., Alpha to the Moon, Iota to the Sun, Omega to Saturn). [1]
Sympathetic Resonance: By vibrating these specific vowel sounds at precise frequencies, the Gnostic initiate believed they were creating a sympathetic acoustic resonance with the universe. The vibration literally acted as a sonic key to unlock the heavenly gates and shield the ascending soul from hostile cosmic rulers. [1]

4. The Cross-Cultural Shift: Western Mantras

Linguistically, Gnostic vowel vibrations function exactly like Eastern mantras, such as the Hindu and Buddhist “Om/Aum” chant or the Sufi “HU”. [1, 2]

Listen to an evocative interpretation of traditional Gnostic chanting structures, which mirrors the rhythmic, non-semantic nature of ecstatic vocalizations:

02:07:02

Chant of the Gnostics: Lo Boier (2 Hours) – Cathar Music

601K views · 4 years ago

YouTube · Patrick Lenk

If you’d like to explore this historical connection further, we can look at:

The Montanist Movement, an early Christian group that fiercely championed ecstatic speaking in tongues and clashed with the early Church orthodoxy.
The specific appearance of these vowel constellations within ancient Greek Magical Papyri (PGM). [1, 2, 3, 4]

15 sites

What “Speaking In Tongues” Does To Your BrainMar 7, 2025 — what you’re about to look at is a ritual known as speaking in tongues. it won’t be long till you’re going to lose your Spanish. an…18:08YouTube·ReligionForBreakfast
Speaking in tongues – WikipediaFor other uses, see Speaking in Tongues (disambiguation). “Glossolalia” redirects here. For the Steve Walsh album, see Glossolalia…Wikipedia
Speaking in Tongues: Divine Gift or Psychological Phenomenon?Dec 19, 2023 — and sometimes most often not frequent traveling to Africa as well to share the gospel. so I do believe that. I have some standing …21:30YouTube·Dr Victor Counted

Show all

The Montanist Movement, an early Christian group that fiercely championed ecstatic speaking in tongues and clashed with the early Church orthodoxy.

Their practices directly triggered the early Church’s first institutional synods and accelerated the closing of the biblical canon to suppress these outbursts. [1]

1. The Nature of Montanist Ecstasy

Unlike traditional biblical prophecy where the prophet remained coherent and conscious, Montanist prophecy was characterized by an abnormal, frenzied ecstasy. [1, 2]

The Passive Instrument: Montanus taught that a prophet was merely a passive musical instrument played by the Holy Spirit. He recorded the Spirit as saying: “Behold, the human being is like a lyre, and I fly over it like a plectrum.” [1, 2, 3]
Frenzied Glossolalia: The 4th-century church historian Eusebius recorded that Montanus would suddenly fall into a state of “abnormal ecstasy,” whereupon he would become frenzied and begin to “babble and utter strange sounds”. This ecstatic, non-semantic language was viewed by followers as the direct, raw utterance of the Paraclete (Holy Spirit). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

2. Why Orthodoxy Clashed with the “New Revelation”

Superseding Scripture: The primary heresy of Montanism was the claim that their ecstatic utterances provided continuous, fresh revelation that could supersede the teachings of Jesus or Paul. [1, 2]
The Ego-Dissolution Shock: Orthodox leaders were horrified that Montanus, Priscilla, and Maximilla spoke in the first person as God. Montanus would cry out, “I am the Lord God, the Almighty, who abide in man,” while Maximilla proclaimed, “I am speech and spirit and power.” To the developing hierarchy of bishops, this total dissolution of the human ego looked less like divine inspiration and more like demonic possession. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Pagan Resemblance: Church critics pointed out that Montanus was a former priest of the pagan goddess Cybele. They argued that his thrashing, ecstatic tongue-speaking mirrored the wild, irrational states of pagan Roman oracles rather than the sober, alert delivery of Christian prophecy. [1, 2, 3]

3. The Structural Consequence: Shutting Down the Charisma

The clash with Montanism fundamentally altered the architecture of Western Christianity. To combat the spread of the movement, the orthodox Church took aggressive institutional measures: [1, 2]

[ Montanist Ecstatic Outbursts ]
               │
               ▼
 [ First Church Synods Called ]  ──► (Excommunicated the movement around 177 CE)
               │
               ▼
[ Institutional Consolidation ]  ──► (Shifted authority from fluid "prophets" to local "bishops")
               │
               ▼
  [ Closure of the New Testament ] ──► (Declared that public revelation was officially complete)

4. The Gnostic vs. Montanist Contrast

While both Gnostics (with their vowel-vibrations) and Montanists (with their glossolalia) bypassed standard language, they had completely opposite spiritual goals: [1]

The Gnostics approached sound as a metaphysical science. They mathematically used specific vowel combinations as cosmic keys to ascending past hostile rulers to reach the silent Godhead.
The Montanists approached sound as an apocalyptic surrender. They did not care about cosmic maps; they believed the world was ending imminently and that their bodies were physical vessels being violently overridden by the Holy Spirit. [1, 2, 3]

If you’d like to trace how this thread continues through history, let me know if we should explore:

How the brilliant early theologian Tertullian shockingly left the orthodox church to join the Montanists
How modern Pentecostal and Charismatic movements view Montanism as their earliest historical ancestor [1, 3, 4, 5]

24 sites

What are Montanist writings and similarities to Pentecostal …Jun 13, 2024 — Montanism Wikipedia This movement started at around 100 AD These guys started the Orthodox movement with what we call today, Deser…Facebook·Ask About The Orthodox Faith
Montanism – WikipediaMontanism (/ˈmɒntəˌnɪzəm/), known by its adherents as the New Revelation, was an early Christian movement of the mid-to-late 2nd c…Wikipedia
From Pagan Priest to Christian Prophet: The Story of MontanusJan 7, 2025 — how do we balance spiritual enthusiasm with church order how do we maintain high moral standards without falling into legalism. we…1mYouTube·Church History Stories

Show all

How the brilliant early theologian Tertullian shockingly left the orthodox church to join the Montanists

His departure was not caused by a sudden loss of intellectual reason, but by his obsession with moral extremism, spiritual power, and a rejection of institutional compromise. [1]

1. The Core Motive: Rage Against Institutional “Laxity”

Tertullian was a radical purist who believed that the institutional Church was becoming worldly, corrupt, and soft. [1, 2, 3, 4]

2. Charisma vs. Office (The Holy Spirit over the Bishop)

Tertullian grew deeply disillusioned by a Church run by administrators rather than spiritually alive prophets.

The Orthodox Shift: The mainstream Church was shifting authority to the Office of the Bishop to preserve stability. They argued that because public revelation was closed, the Holy Spirit spoke strictly through the unbroken line of church offices. [1]
The Montanist Appeal: The Montanists claimed that the Paraclete (the Holy Spirit) was actively shouting through new prophets in real-time. Tertullian eagerly embraced this. He did not view Montanism as a brand-new religion, but as the long-awaited “Age of the Spirit” that would finalize Christian maturity. He believed the raw, ecstatic glossolalia and prophecies were proof that the living God was overriding human structures. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

3. The Great Rhetorical Insult: Psychici vs. Pneumatici

The Psychici (The Soulish/Animal Men): This was his new, derogatory term for the orthodox mainstream Christians. He mocked them as domestic, fleshy, lazy believers who cared more about church politics, comfort, and regular meals than the searing fire of the Spirit. [1, 2, 3]
The Pneumatici (The Spiritual Men): This was his term for the Montanists. These were the true, elite, spirit-filled believers who fasted constantly, spoke in tongues, received fresh revelations, and were eager to shed their blood for Christ. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

(Note the irony: Tertullian borrowed this exact phraseology from the Gnostics, whom he had spent the first half of his career trying to socially destroy). [1, 2, 3]

4. An Unending Quest for Extremism

What makes Tertullian’s shift even more dramatic is that even the Montanists were ultimately not strict enough for him. [, 2]

The Ultimate Historical Irony

If you’d like to close out this historical journey, let me know if you would like to:

Look at some of the specific scathing insults Tertullian wrote against orthodox bishops in his late book On Fasting
Explore how the closing of the Biblical canon was directly designed to make sure another Tertullian could never happen again [1]

23 sites

Tertullian – OrthodoxWikiTertullian became a Christian about 197 and soon became a leader in the church in North Africa. It is believed his conversion was …OrthodoxWiki
Tertullian – WikipediaTertullian was the first theologian to write in Latin, and so has been called “the father of Latin Christianity”, as well as “the …Wikipedia
Tertullian | Biography, Works, Theology, Montanism, & FactsSometime before 210 Tertullian left the orthodox church to join a new prophetic sectarian movement known as Montanism (founded by …Encyclopedia Britannica

Show all

Look at some of the specific scathing insults Tertullian wrote against orthodox bishops in his late book On Fasting

In his late Montanist treatise, De Ieiunio Adversus Psychicos (“On Fasting, In Opposition to the Psychics”), Tertullian completely unleashes his rhetorical fury on the orthodox bishops and mainstream Christians. Using his trademark legal precision and biting sarcasm, he frames the orthodox leaders not as holy guardians of Christ, but as gluttonous, compromised cowards who worship their own stomachs. [1]

Several specific, scathing themes and insults stand out in the text:

1. The Ultimate Insult: “Your Belly is Your God”

Tertullian leaves no ambiguity about what he thinks drives orthodox theology. He directly accuses the bishops and their followers of weaponizing the Gospel purely to justify their own overeating. [1]

“Your belly is your god, your liver your temple, your paunch your altar, your cook your priest, and the Holy Spirit is nothing but a smell of meat!”

2. Mocking Their “Gospel Liberty” as Lazy Self-Indulgence

The orthodox bishops argued that Christians were no longer bound by strict, mandatory fasts because Christ had brought spiritual freedom. Tertullian mocks this theological defense as nothing more than a pathetic excuse to stay full and fat.

“You look upon the Gospel as a license for gluttony… You maintain that fasts are to be chosen voluntarily, not imposed by command, plainly so that you can choose not to do them.”

3. Accusing Bishops of Being “Double Agents” of Food

Tertullian points out a massive hypocrisy: the bishops forbid the strict fasting mandated by the Montanist prophets, yet they gladly order extra fasts whenever it serves their own political or ecclesiastical authority. [1]

“You reprimand us for introducing ‘novelty’ when we fast. Yet, when a bishop commands a fast for some public emergency, you obey instantly. Thus, you grant to human authority a right which you deny to the Holy Spirit.”

4. The Savage Tale of the Drunken “Martyr”

In one of the most vicious passages of the book, Tertullian describes an orthodox Christian who went to trial under Roman persecution. Because the orthodox Christians rejected fasting, this man indulged in food and heavy wine right before his interrogation. Tertullian recounts his gruesome, embarrassing death with utter contempt: [1]

“…at high noon, you premedicated with drugged wine as an antidote… and so completely enervated, that on being tickled—for his intoxication made it feel like tickling—with a few claws, he was unable any more to make answer to the presiding officer…”

In this damning anecdote, Tertullian claims the man died in a state of drunken apostasy rather than martyrdom, mocking the orthodox rejection of strict, sober discipline. [1]

5. Redefining the Church as a Kitchen

Tertullian famously concludes that the mainstream Church’s aversion to ascetic discipline has transformed their holy gatherings into nothing more than culinary social clubs, writing that for them, “agape (brotherly love) boils in your kettles, faith warms in your kitchens, and hope resides in your dishes”. [1]

You can read the full, fiery translated text of the treatise on the Christian Classics Ethereal Library.
Check out historical background and commentary on The Tertullian Project. [1, 2]

If you would like to explore further, we can look at:

The specific scriptural arguments the orthodox bishops used against Tertullian (such as quoting Paul on “food laws”)
How this document demonstrates the massive schism over martyrdom in the early 3rd century [1, 2]

5 sites

Tertullian: On Fasting – Christian Classics Ethereal Library… not to be willing to die—on the very last day of trial, at high noon, you premedicated with drugged wine as an antidote, and s…Christian Classics Ethereal Library
The Apology of Tertullian: Then and Now | Modern ReformationTertullian has a few helpful points on defending and living the faith “once for all delivered to the saints” in an increasingly un…Modern Reformation
On Fasting – Tertullian – Christian Classics Ethereal LibraryConcerning the limit of marrying, we have already published a defence of monogamy. … [Which is a note of time, not unimportant.]Christian Classics Ethereal Library

Show all

The specific appearance of these vowel constellations within ancient Greek Magical Papyri (PGM

1. The Visual Geometry of the Vowels

Visual Example of a Vowel Pyramid in PGM Spells:

       α
      ε ε
     η η η
    ι ι ι ι
   ο ο ο ο ο
  υ υ υ υ υ υ
 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω

2. The Seven Vowels as Seven Cosmic Notes

Α (Alpha): The Moon 🌙
Ε (Epsilon): Mercury ☿
Η (Eta): Venus ♀
Ι (Iota): The Sun ☉
Ο (Omicron): Mars ♂
Υ (Upsilon): Jupiter ♃
Ω (Omega): Saturn ♄

3. Concrete Textual Examples from the PGM

The papyri are littered with instructions telling the practitioner exactly how to vibrate these vowel strings to achieve altered states of consciousness.

The Mithras Liturgy (PGM IV. 475-829)

“Draw in breath from the divine rays three times, as deeply as you can… and say: ‘I E O O O I E O O O O I E E E O O O I I I O O O O O U U U U U Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω’. Draw in your breath, and make a clicking sound… bellow like a bull, then hiss like a snake.”

Spell for Acquiring a Daimon Companion (PGM I. 42-195)

In this invocation, the magician uses strings of vowels as an “unutterable name” to force a divine spirit into the physical room:

“I call upon you, the greatest god, eternal lord… ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ ΩΥΟΙΗΕΑ. Come to me, reveal yourself, by your holy and unutterable names: ΑΩ ΗΩ ΙΩ ΟΩ ΥΩ!”

4. The Linguistic Connection to Glossolalia

Linguists and historians of religion note that the PGM provides the closest historical bridge between Gnostic vowel chanting and Christian speaking in tongues.

If you’d like to dive into the physical reality of these ancient texts, you can explore:

The definitive academic collection: The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation edited by Hans Dieter Betz.
Digital archives of the original papyri fragments hosted by the Trismegistos Project.

Let me know if you would like to expand on:

The specific breathing techniques (like pneuma drawing) the PGM outlines for vocal vibrations
How these vowel structures evolved into modern Western occult practices (like the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn)

The specific breathing techniques (like pneuma drawing) the PGM outlines for vocal vibrations

The PGM outlines four distinct, highly specific breathing and vocalization techniques. [1, 2, 3]

1. The Pneuma Draw (Pneuma Helkein)

The Mechanics: The practitioner stood facing a specific cardinal direction (often East toward the rising sun) and took three deep, diaphragmatic inhalations through the nose or mouth. [1]
The Ritual Goal: By packing the lungs with pneuma, the magician was literally inflating their human biology with divine power. The breath acted as the fuel or gunpowder; the vowel chant that followed was the projectile.

2. The Pop or Click (Poppysmos)

Once the breath was drawn, the exhalation often began with a sharp, non-lexical acoustic trigger called a poppysmos (ποππυσμός).

The Mechanics: This involved a rapid clicking, smacking, or popping sound made by pressing the lips or tongue tightly together and releasing them sharply with a burst of air.
The Ritual Goal: In texts like the Mithras Liturgy (PGM IV), this sound was used to stun or command lesser elemental spirits. It acted as an abrupt, violent energetic discharge that cracked open the threshold between the mundane world and the spirit realm.

3. Hissing (Syrigmos)

After the sharp click, the magician would often regulate the outflow of their breath into a long, continuous hiss, known as a syrigmos (συριγμός).

The Mechanics: The practitioner forced the exhaled air through a tight seal of the teeth and lips (creating a sharp “Sssss” or “Shhhh” sound).
The Ritual Goal: In the ancient world, the hiss was the sonic signature of the serpent. Because deities like Helios, IAO, and various Egyptian gods were associated with solar serpents or dragons (like the Agathodaemon), the hiss was a method of vocal shape-shifting. By matching the acoustic frequency of a serpent, the magician achieved sympathetic resonance with those specific cosmic forces. [1, 2]

4. Bellowing (Mykesis)

The final, most physically intense stage of the respiratory ritual was the mykesis (μύκησις)—a deep, guttural bellow or roar.

The Mechanics: The magician dropped their jaw, widened their throat, and forced the remaining air out from the very bottom of their abdomen. The text literally commands the sorcerer to “bellow like a bull” or low from the stomach.
The Ritual Goal: This was the physical delivery system for the long strings of planetary vowels (ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ). The deep roaring vibration shook the chest cavity and larynx, maximizing the acoustic volume and physical resonance of the vowels. It was designed to echo through the ritual space and violently command the Archons (cosmic rulers) to open their heavenly gates.

A Sample Ritual Sequence from PGM IV

The texts seamlessly weave these techniques together into a precise, step-by-step respiratory loop:

[ Step 1: Pneuma Draw ] ──► Inhale deeply 3 times to gather divine energy.
            │
            ▼
[ Step 2: Poppysmos ]   ──► Snap the lips/tongue to shatter the veil.
            │
            ▼
[ Step 3: Syrigmos ]     ──► Exhale a long, low hiss to evoke the solar serpent.
            │
            ▼
[ Step 4: Mykesis ]      ──► Bellow the vowel strings from the depths of the belly.

The connection between these techniques and Hesychasm (the Eastern Orthodox meditative breathing prayer method)

While its theological purpose is entirely different from the sorcery of the PGM, the underlying physiological and linguistic mechanics are remarkably similar.

1. The Jesus Prayer as a Christian Mantra

Where the PGM sorcerer chanted strings of vowels (AEHIOYW) to align with planetary spheres, the Hesychast monk continuously repeats a single formula known as the Jesus Prayer:

“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”

2. The Somatic Breathing Method

In the 13th century, a Hesychast manual written by Nicephorus the Solitary explicitly outlined a physical breathing technique to anchor the mind during prayer. It bears an undeniable structural resemblance to the pneuma drawing of the ancient papyri:

The Inhalation: The monk is instructed to sit on a low stool, bow their head, tuck their chin against their chest, and focus their eyes on their navel or heart center. They then inhale slowly through the nose, consciously “tracing” the breath as it travels down into the lungs.
The Heart Drop: Nicephorus writes: “Force your mind to descend into the heart along with the inhaled air. Keep it there… do not let it come out immediately.”
The Exhalation: The monk then coordinates the words of the Jesus Prayer with the slow, controlled release of the breath. Usually, “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God” is recited during the inhale, and “have mercy on me, a sinner” is breathed out.

3. Energy: Magia vs. Theosis

While the physical loops of drawing breath and vibrating sacred words are identical, the theological frameworks of the PGM and Hesychasm are diametrically opposed:

Feature	Greek Magical Papyri (PGM)	Hesychasm (Eastern Orthodoxy)
The Goal	Magia (Coercion): To violently command spirits, force open cosmic gates, and manifest earthly desires.	Theosis (Union): To achieve a state of pure humility and become unified with the uncreated energy of God.
The Breath	Pneuma as an elemental fuel to be weaponized by the human ego.	Breath as a tool to quiet the ego and surrender to divine grace.
The Sound	High-volume bellows (mykesis) and clicks to shatter the environment.	Barely audible whispers or absolute interior silence.

4. The “Brilliant Darkness” of Mount Athos

The ultimate goal of the Hesychast breathing method is to experience the Tabor Light—the same uncreated, blinding light that the apostles saw surrounding Jesus during the Transfiguration on Mount Sinai.

When a monk achieves this state through breathing and prayer, they describe it using the exact same apophatic paradoxes coined by Pseudo-Dionysius: a “brilliant darkness” or an “inaccessible light.” The breathing technique acts as a physiological brake system. By slowing down the heart rate and respiratory rhythm, the monk starves the ego of distraction, allowing them to rest in the silent, formless ground of the divine.

The structural similarities between Christian Hesychasm and Hindu Pranayama are so profound that scholars often refer to Hesychast monks as the “Byzantine Yogis”. Both systems independently discovered that the human respiratory system could be used as a biological brake to halt racing thoughts and trigger deep, non-dual mystical experiences. [1, 2, 3]

While their theological destinations are entirely different, their psycho-physical roadmaps are nearly identical. [1, 2]

1. Structural Comparison: Mechanics of the Breath

Both traditions synchronize rhythmic respiration with vocal or mental recitation to anchor human attention. [1, 2]

Feature	Hesychasm (Eastern Orthodox)	Pranayama (Hindu Yoga)
The Core Phrase	The Jesus Prayer	A Mantra (e.g., OM or Soham)
Inhalation	Inhale slowly while reciting the first half of the prayer.	Puraka (Controlled, conscious inhalation).
Retention	Hold the breath, forcing the mind down into the “heart center”.	Kumbhaka (Retention of breath to concentrate energy).
Exhalation	Exhale slowly while completing the prayer.	Rechaka (Controlled, conscious exhalation).
The Target Organ	The Heart (Kardia), viewed as the seat of the soul.	The Anahata Chakra (The heart energy center).

2. Posture and the Flow of Energy

Both practices demand strict physical positions to channel somatic awareness inward, though they interpret the geometry of the body differently.

Pranayama (Asana): The Yogi sits with a perfectly straight spine (such as in Padmasana or Lotus Pose). The goal is to keep the central energetic channel (Sushumna Nadi) entirely vertical, allowing cosmic energy (Prana/Kundalini) to rise freely up into the brain.
Hesychasm: The monk adopts a drastically different posture, sitting on a low stool with their head bowed deeply, chin pressed against the chest, staring down at the navel or chest. Rather than straight-spined verticality, the Hesychast curves the body into a closed circle. This physical looping is designed to represent humility and forcefully redirect the erratic mind back down into the stillness of the heart.

3. The Shared Psychological Goal: Halting the Mind

Both systems recognize that human anxiety and spiritual blindness are caused by the chaotic, nonstop chatter of the mind. They deploy the breath as a specific mechanism to force this chatter to a standstill.

Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: Defines the ultimate goal of yoga as Chitta Vritti Nirodha—“the cessation of the modifications of the mind.” Controlling the breath (Pranayama) starves the intellect of its frantic fuel, stabilizing consciousness.
The Philokalia (Hesychast Texts): Describes the goal as Nepsis (Watchfulness) and Hesychia (Stillness). By tethering the mind to the slow, heavy rhythm of the lungs, the monk stops Logismoi (intrusive thoughts and mental fantasies) from polluting the soul.

4. The Final Experience: Blinding Mystical Light

The most striking parallel is the final somatic phenomenon reported by masters of both lineages. When the breathing rhythm drops to an extreme whisper and the mind completely empties, practitioners do not experience a blank blackout. They experience an internal, uncreated light.

The Yogi achieves Samadhi (absorption), experiencing the inner self as a blinding light of pure, unconditioned consciousness (Chit).
The Hesychast experiences the Tabor Light—the uncreated divine energy of God that shone on Mount Sinai, engulfing the quieted monk in a state of Theosis (deification).

The Fundamental Divergence

Despite these identical biological mechanics, their theological frameworks remain completely separate:

Pranayama operates within a monistic or isolationist framework. The goal is Kaivalya (liberation) or realizing that your individual self (Atman) is fundamentally identical to the supreme universe (Brahman). It is an awakening to your own true nature.
Hesychasm remains strictly relational and dialogical. The monk does not believe they are God; rather, they are a created being crying out for mercy to a personal Savior. The breath does not generate divinity; it simply empties the human vessel so that a completely distinct, loving God can pour His grace into it.

The Neuroscience of the Pratice.

Modern neuroscience confirms that the identical feelings of profound peace and flashes of internal mystical light (known in neurobiology as photisms) reported in both Hesychasm and Pranayama are not coincidences. They are the direct, reproducible results of hacking human neurophysiology.

By manipulating respiratory patterns, both practices alter blood chemistry, manipulate brainwave frequencies, and suppress the brain networks responsible for maintaining the physical boundaries of the ego.

1. The Neurology of Absolute Peace: Vagal Tone and Blood Chemistry

The intense state of calmness achieved in both practices is a direct result of shifting the autonomic nervous system from a sympathetic (“fight-or-flight”) state to a parasympathetic (“rest-and-digest”) state.

The Vagus Nerve Hack: Both Hesychasm and Pranayama utilize extended exhalations combined with breath retention. Slow, diaphragmatic breathing physically stretches the baroreceptors in the lungs and heart, sending electrical signals up the vagus nerve. This triggers a massive release of acetylcholine, slowing the heart rate, lowering blood pressure, and flooding the limbic system with a profound biochemical sense of safety.
Locus Coeruleus Suppression: Slow nasal breathing modulates the pre-Bötzinger complex in the brainstem. This directly dials down the activity of the locus coeruleus, the brain’s primary site for synthesizing noradrenaline. When noradrenaline production drops, racing thoughts (logismoi or chitta vritti) physically stop, forcing the emotional amygdala to go quiet.

2. The Neurology of Mystical Light: Sensory Deprivation and “Photisms”

The experience of seeing uncreated, brilliant internal light (the Christian Tabor Light or Yogic Samadhi Light) without any external visual stimuli is a well-documented neurological phenomenon. [1, 2]

[ Extreme Slow Breathing ] ──► Decreases CO2 and induces localized hypoxia.
            │
            ▼
 [ Sensory Deafferentation ]  ──► Occipital lobe gets cut off from external input.
            │
            ▼
[ Compensatory Hyper-Firing ] ──► Visual cortex generates its own "phosphenes/photisms."
            │
            ▼
  [ Experiencing Inner Light ] ──► The brain perceives a blinding spiritual glow.

Hypoxia and Hypercapnia: Sustained breath retention (Yogic Kumbhaka) or ultra-slow breathing patterns artificially manipulate carbon dioxide levels and oxygen saturation in the brain. Mild, controlled shifts in blood gases alter neural excitability in the occipital lobe (the visual cortex), causing visual neurons to spontaneously discharge.
Sensory Deprivation Syndrome: Sitting in absolute stillness, with closed or fixed eyes, and ignoring external stimuli causes the sensory thalamus to block external input from reaching the cortex. Starved of data, the visual cortex experiences deafferentation. To compensate for the lack of real light, the brain’s predictive processing networks “turn up the gain” on internal neural noise, transforming baseline optical static into perception of a blinding, transcendent glow.

Dissolving the Ego: The Default Mode Network (DMN)

Perhaps the most striking parallel is the shared experience of non-duality—the feeling that the barrier between the “seeker” and “God/Universe” has dissolved.

Neuroimaging studies show that advanced breath-focused meditation completely dampens the Default Mode Network (DMN). The DMN consists of a cluster of interconnected brain regions (like the posterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex) that construct your narrative identity, ego, past memories, and future anxieties.

Furthermore, these intense respiratory rhythms cause a temporary deactivation of the parietal lobe, the specific region responsible for spatial orientation. Under normal circumstances, the parietal lobe tells you exactly where your physical body ends and the outside world begins. When suppressed, your brain loses its ability to track spatial boundaries.

The psychological result is instantaneous: you feel completely infinite, boundless, and unified with the ground of existence.

Summary of Neuro-Mystical Convergence

Symptom Reported by Mystics	Neurological Event
Shattering of Intrusive Thoughts	Suppression of the Locus Coeruleus (Noradrenaline drop).
Profound, Unshakable Peace	Vagal nerve stimulation & Parasympathetic dominance.
Blinding Internal Spiritual Light	Mild localized hypoxia triggering hyper-firing in the visual cortex.
Ego Dissolution / Union	Deactivation of the Default Mode Network & Spatial Parietal Lobe.

The landmark neuroimaging research conducted by Dr. Andrew Newberg at the University of Pennsylvania reveals that glossolalia (speaking in tongues) operates on a completely opposite neurological mechanism than meditation. While meditation is an exercise in intense, self-directed concentration, glossolalia is a state of absolute cognitive surrender.

SPECT scans tracking regional cerebral blood flow during these states highlight how the brain handles these two mystical experiences differently:

1. Frontal Lobes: Willpower vs. Surrender

In Meditation: Frontal lobe activity increases significantly. The prefrontal cortex—the seat of willpower, attention, and executive function—fires intensely as the practitioner deliberately focuses on a mantra, breath, or visualization.
In Glossolalia: Frontal lobe activity sharply decreases. The region that makes a human feel in voluntary control essentially shuts down. This neuro-snapshot perfectly mirrors the practitioner’s description: they are not consciously generating the speech; they have surrendered their vocal tract to an outside spiritual force.

2. Language Centers: Active Construction vs. Bypassed Systems

In Meditation: If the meditation involves chanting a specific sacred text, the brain’s standard language structures (like Broca’s area) remain highly active to coordinate semantic speech.
In Glossolalia: Even though the person is speaking rapidly, the brain’s formal language centers remain quiet. The brain is not processing grammar, syntax, or vocabulary. Neuroscientists believe the motor control of vocalization is recycled or shifted to domain-general pathways, allowing raw acoustic rhythm to flow without cognitive editing.

3. Parietal Lobes: Oneness vs. Being “Touched”

In Meditation: Parietal lobe activity drops drastically. Because the parietal lobe creates your sense of spatial orientation and physical boundaries, starving it of activity causes your ego to dissolve, creating a feeling of boundaryless oneness with the universe.
In Glossolalia: Parietal lobe activity increases. The self does not dissolve into a vacuum. Instead, this heightened activity is associated with a hyper-awareness of a relationship—a feeling of your distinct self being actively “visited” or “touched by the Spirit”.

4. Subcortical Shifts: Caudate and Thalamus

The Caudate Dip: Glossolalia scans show a unique decrease in the left caudate. Since the caudate is heavily involved in motor planning and emotional gating, this dip suggests the brain is turning off its internal editor, allowing emotional and vocal expressions to bypass normal behavioral restraints.
Thalamic Influx: During glossolalia, activity in the thalamus increases. The thalamus is the master router of all sensory and emotional data, indicating that while conscious willpower is offline, the brain is experiencing a massive influx of emotional energy.

Neuro-Structural Comparison

Neurological Metric	Concentrative Meditation	Glossolalia (Speaking in Tongues)
Frontal Lobes (Control)	Increased (High focus/willpower)	Decreased (Total surrender of agency)
Parietal Lobes (Self)	Decreased (Ego dissolution / void)	Increased (Relational sensory feeling)
Language Centers	Active (Semantic monitoring)	Quiet (Non-semantic vocal output)
Psychological State	Conscious, structured detachment	Spontaneous, ecstatic flow

Ultimately, this data demonstrates that the human brain possesses multiple distinct pathways for altered states of consciousness. While the Via Negativa of meditation quietens the brain to reach a silent void, glossolalia bypasses the ego’s control mechanisms to let raw, unedited emotional expression burst forth.

The Via Negativa indeed!

The Philokalia

The Philokalia (Greek for “Love of the Beautiful/Exalted”) is the foundational encyclopedia of Eastern Orthodox Christian mysticism. Compiled in the 18th century by Saint Nikodemos of the Holy Mountain and Saint Makarios of Corinth, it is a massive five-volume anthology of texts written between the 4th and 15th centuries by the Desert Fathers and the monks of Mount Athos.

While Western Christianity largely leaned into rational scholasticism and legal theology, the Philokalia preserved a precise, experimental, psychological manual for achieving Theosis (direct union with God) through stillness.

1. The Core Objective: Nepsis and Hesychia

The Philokalia is not a book of abstract theology; it is a clinical textbook for the human soul. It operates on two primary psychological concepts:

Hesychia (Stillness): The absolute external and internal quiet required to hear the Divine.
Nepsis (Watchfulness/Sobriety): A state of hyper-vigilance where the monk stands guard at the gates of their own mind, inspecting every single thought before it can take root.

2. The Internal Enemy: Anatomy of a Logismos

One of the most profound contributions of the Philokalia is its multi-step breakdown of how a single intrusive thought (logismos) escalates into an addiction or sin. The text outlines a precise psychological timeline:

[ 1. Provocation (Provoli) ] ──► An intrusive thought or image pops into the mind.
│
▼
[ 2. Coupling (Syndiasmos) ] ──► You begin to entertain the thought, playing with it.
│
▼
[ 3. Assent (Synkatathesis)] ──► The ego approves the thought and desires to act.
│
▼
[ 4. Captivity (Aichmalosia) ] ──► The thought becomes an obsessive, driving fixation.
│
▼
[ 5. Passion (Pathos) ] ──► The mind becomes enslaved to a deeply ingrained habit.

The instructions in the Philokalia teach the monk to strike at Step 1 (Provocation). Using Nepsis, the monk catches the thought instantly and uses the rhythm of the Jesus Prayer to vaporize it before it can couple with the imagination.

3. The Core Instructions: The Physical Method

The actual instructions for prayer—pioneered by masters like Saint Simeon the New Theologian and Nicephorus the Solitary—involve the physical mechanics that mirror Eastern yoga and ancient breath-work:

The Posture: The monk must sit on a low stool (about 8-10 inches high) in a darkened, quiet cell. They are told to curve their spine, press their chin firmly against their chest, and cast their physical gaze down toward their heart or navel.
The Breath Loop: The monk must deliberately slow down their breathing. As they inhale through the nose, they mentally pull their scattered attention out of their head and drag it down into the physical cavity of the heart.
The Sonic Anchor: The monk continuously anchors this loop to the Jesus Prayer (“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me”). The prayer is repeated so continuously that it shifts from an oral recitation to a self-activating, unceasing pulse within the nervous system.

4. Key Authors to Know Within the Anthology

The Philokalia collects dozens of writers, but three specific masters provide the actual blueprints for practice:

Evagrius Ponticus (4th Century): The brilliant psychologist of the desert. He was the first to catalog how demonic thoughts attack the mind and how to use scripture as an active psychological shield (Antirrhēsis).
St. John Climacus (7th Century): Author of The Ladder of Divine Ascent. He provides the practical steps on how to violently break addictions, overcome egoism, and cultivate tears of repentance.
St. Gregory Palamas (14th Century): The intellectual defender of the monks. When Western theologians mocked the Hesychasts as “navel-gazers,” Palamas wrote the definitive defense, proving that the light the monks saw during their breathing prayers was the literal, uncreated energy of God.

5. Why the Text Remained a Secret

For centuries, the Philokalia was treated with extreme caution. Orthodox authorities actively discouraged laypeople from reading the technical breathing instructions without the strict, daily guidance of an experienced spiritual father (Geron or Starets).

The texts themselves warn that manipulating the breath, staring at the navel, and forcing the mind into the heart without deep humility can cause severe psychological breakdowns, visual hallucinations (spiritual delusion, known as Plani or Prelest), and severe spiritual pride. The physical techniques are strictly tools; without love and humility, they are considered entirely useless.

The Via Negativa

1. D.T. Suzuki: Eckhart as the “Zen Master” of the West

Alan Watts: Deconstructing the Cosmic “Ego”

The Lasting Impact

AI Mode Conversation: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckharts philophy of religion

You said: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

Apophatic Theology

Pseudo-Dionysiusand the Mystical Theology.

Neti, Neti and the West.

The Via Negativa of Mystical Language that Blocks the Mind.

Montanism

The Defection of Tertullian – Choosing to Become a Holy Roller.

The Greek Magical Papyri

Breathing Techniques of the Greek Magical Papyri.

The Jesus Prayer as Mantra

AI Mode Conversation: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckharts philophy of religion

You said: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

The Neuroscience of the Pratice.

The Philokalia

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

1. D.T. Suzuki: Eckhart as the “Zen Master” of the West

Alan Watts: Deconstructing the Cosmic “Ego”

The Lasting Impact

AI Mode Conversation: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckharts philophy of religion

You said: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

Apophatic Theology

Pseudo-Dionysiusand the Mystical Theology.

Neti, Neti and the West.

The Via Negativa of Mystical Language that Blocks the Mind.

Montanism

The Defection of Tertullian – Choosing to Become a Holy Roller.

The Greek Magical Papyri

Breathing Techniques of the Greek Magical Papyri.

The Jesus Prayer as Mantra

AI Mode Conversation: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckharts philophy of religion

You said: can you explain the Via Negativa in meister eckhart’s philosophy of religion

The Neuroscience of the Pratice.

The Philokalia

Share this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply